Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 575.05 (2026)

Property Applied To Judgment; Receiver

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The judge may order any of the judgment debtor's property in the hands of the judgment debtor or of any other person, or due to the judgment debtor, not exempt from execution, to be applied toward the satisfaction of the judgment. The judgment debtor's earnings for personal services within 30 days preceding the order cannot be so applied, when it appears by the judgment debtor's affidavit that they are necessary for the use of a family supported, wholly or partly, by the judgment debtor's labor. The judge may appoint a receiver of the debtor's unexempt property, or forbid a transfer or other disposition thereof, or any interference therewith, until further order therein.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases, 1986–2016 · leading case: Fannie Mae v. Heather Apts. Ltd. P'ship, 811 N.W.2d 596 (Minn. 2012).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Fannie Mae v. Heather Apts. Ltd. P'ship, 811 N.W.2d 596 (Minn. 2012). · cites it 44× “This case presents the question of whether Minn.Stat. § 575.05 (2010) authorizes a district court to issue a temporary injunction prohibiting a judgment debtor from transferring or disposing of property that is not presently in the hands of or due to the judgment debtor.”

Mae v. Heather Apts. Ltd. P'ship, 799 N.W.2d 638 (Minn. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 10× “The district court based the June 2 and June 16 orders on Minn.Stat. § 575.05 (2010), which provides: The [district court] may order any of the judgment debtor’s property in the hands of the judgment debtor or of any other person, or due to the judgment debtor, not exempt from…”

Overocker v. Solie, 597 N.W.2d 579 (Minn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “Appellant requested as relief, first, a declaration that the restaurants were the property of Danny Solie and, second, a levy of execution against the restaurants under Minn. Stat. § 575.05 (1998). Respondents acknowledge that the restaurants were set up as corporations, with…”

Marriage of Porter v. Porter, 389 N.W.2d 739 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “Did the trial court err in ordering appellant to pay contract for deed proceeds to the court administrator without complete supplementary proceedings pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 575.05 (1984)? 2. Were the contract for deed proceeds exempt from respondent’s collection attempts as…”

Robert Kagel v. Christian Brackey, Kagel Acquisition Co., LLC (Minn. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 6× “833 (2014) or, alternatively, Minn. Stat. § 575.05 (2014). The district court ordered a process whereby the parties would obtain an appraisal of KAC’s property, Kagel would then make an offer on the property, and if the parties could not agree on the sale, they would be deemed…”

Charles F. Bond v. Am. Select Ins. Mgmt. Corp., a Florida Corp., Timothy J. Pawlik (Minn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “See Minn. Stat. § 575.05 (2012) (providing that the district court “may order any of the judgment debtor’s property in the hands of the judgment debtor or .”

Mark W. Tibbals v. Kerry G. Tibbals (Minn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “” Minn. Stat. § 575.05 (2012). “Our statute defines certain cases wherein a receiver may be appointed.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.