Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 6.13 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1955 c 863 s 22]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1990–2018 · leading case: In Re Hennepin Cnty. 1986 Recycling Bond Litig., 540 N.W.2d 494 (Minn. 1995).
In Re Hennepin Cnty. 1986 Recycling Bond Litig., 540 N.W.2d 494 (Minn. 1995). “) [5] Section 6.13 of the Loan Agreement pertains to renewal of the Letter of Credit.”
In re Petters Co., 506 B.R. 784 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2013). “Security Agreement § 6.13(b), Exh. PCF_006.0085. 75 Significantly, prior to opening its facility for Opportunity Finance, DZ Bank knew that Opportunity Finance “does not normally perform any notification procedures with the Buyer or Seller to verify the purchase order.”
Heimerl v. Tech Elec. of Minnesota, Inc., 9 F. Supp. 3d 1002 (D. Minnesota 2014). “2, § 6.13(b).) In addition, the Inside Agreement vests the Trustees with the right to seek legal redress if an employer is delinquent in its contributions: The Trustees of any fringe benefit fund, may for the purpose of collecting any payments required to be made to such funds,…”
In Re Hennepin Cnty. 1986 Recycling Bond Litig., 517 N.W.2d 63 (Minn. Ct. App. 1994). “In addition to the redemption provisions, Loan Agreement § 6.13 provides: In the event that the Banks offer to renew the Letter of Credit, the acceptance of such offer shall require the agreement of both the County and [HERC].”
Smith v. City of Owatonna, 450 N.W.2d 309 (Minn. 1990). “Sackman, 2 Nichols' The Law of Eminent Domain, § 6.13 (3d ed.1989) (citing Stanwood v. Malden, 157 Mass.”
State v. Minn. Sch. of Bus., Inc., 915 N.W.2d 903 (Minn. Ct. App. 2018). “, Minnesota Practice § 6.13 (2017-2018 ed.) (stating that plaintiffs need "to prove that the defendant proximately caused [their] loss").”
— Minn. Stat. § 6.13(b) — 2 cases
In re Petters Co., 506 B.R. 784 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2013). “Security Agreement § 6.13(b), Exh. PCF_006.0085. 75 Significantly, prior to opening its facility for Opportunity Finance, DZ Bank knew that Opportunity Finance “does not normally perform any notification procedures with the Buyer or Seller to verify the purchase order.”
Heimerl v. Tech Elec. of Minnesota, Inc., 9 F. Supp. 3d 1002 (D. Minnesota 2014). “2, § 6.13(b).) In addition, the Inside Agreement vests the Trustees with the right to seek legal redress if an employer is delinquent in its contributions: The Trustees of any fringe benefit fund, may for the purpose of collecting any payments required to be made to such funds,…”
— Minn. Stat. § 6.13(c)(1) — 1 case
Heimerl v. Tech Elec. of Minnesota, Inc., 9 F. Supp. 3d 1002 (D. Minnesota 2014). “2, § 6.13(b).) In addition, the Inside Agreement vests the Trustees with the right to seek legal redress if an employer is delinquent in its contributions: The Trustees of any fringe benefit fund, may for the purpose of collecting any payments required to be made to such funds,…”
— Minn. Stat. § 6.13(c)(2) — 1 case
Heimerl v. Tech Elec. of Minnesota, Inc., 9 F. Supp. 3d 1002 (D. Minnesota 2014). “2, § 6.13(b).) In addition, the Inside Agreement vests the Trustees with the right to seek legal redress if an employer is delinquent in its contributions: The Trustees of any fringe benefit fund, may for the purpose of collecting any payments required to be made to such funds,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.