Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 60. INSURANCE DIVISION
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 60.17 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1967 c 395 art 1 s 25]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1963–1987 · leading case: Farmers & Merchants State Bank of Pierz v. Bosshart, 400 N.W.2d 739 (Minn. 1987).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Farmers & Merchants State Bank of Pierz v. Bosshart, 400 N.W.2d 739 (Minn. 1987). · cites it 2× “Probably through inadvertence, the Revisor of Statutes has neglected to change Minn.Stat. § 60.17, subd. 12 (1986) to reflect the fact that Minn.”
Wildwood Mink Ranch v. United States, 218 F. Supp. 67 (D. Minnesota 1963). · cites it 3× “For example, § 60.17(a) says that flights anywhere shall be conducted at: “An altitude which will permit, in the event of the failure of a power unit, an emergency landing without undue hazard to persons or property on the surface.”
Hansen v. Am. Nat'l Bank, 396 N.W.2d 642 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “His claim, described in his brief, centers on his belief that naming Turlinski as a party in the original action resulted in a fraud on the court because Turlinski and the bank had negotiated a settlement which included the bank’s agreement not to sue Turlinski.”
— Minn. Stat. § 60.17(a) — 1 case
Wildwood Mink Ranch v. United States, 218 F. Supp. 67 (D. Minnesota 1963). “For example, § 60.17(a) says that flights anywhere shall be conducted at: “An altitude which will permit, in the event of the failure of a power unit, an emergency landing without undue hazard to persons or property on the surface.”
— Minn. Stat. § 60.17(b) — 1 case
Wildwood Mink Ranch v. United States, 218 F. Supp. 67 (D. Minnesota 1963). “For example, § 60.17(a) says that flights anywhere shall be conducted at: “An altitude which will permit, in the event of the failure of a power unit, an emergency landing without undue hazard to persons or property on the surface.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.