Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 60.24 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1967 c 395 art 1 s 25]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1987–2003 · leading case: Marriage of Maranda v. Maranda, 449 N.W.2d 158 (Minn. 1989).
Marriage of Maranda v. Maranda, 449 N.W.2d 158 (Minn. 1989). “1987); see generally 2A Herr & Haydock, Minnesota Practice § 60.24 (1985). The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has characterized fraud on the court as "a scheme to interfere with the judicial machinery performing the task of impartial adjudication, as by…”
City of Barnum v. Sabri, 657 N.W.2d 201 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). “” Herr & Hay-dock, supra, § 60.24. Here, while the August 22, 2000, judgment is not an injunction, it has a similar prospective effect of authorizing the city to raze Sabri’s building because of its unsafe condition.”
Marriage of Glorvigen v. Glorvigen, 438 N.W.2d 692 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). “" It is fraud connected with the presentation of a case to the court, and differs from the "intrinsic or extrinsic" fraud envisioned by clause (3) of Minn.”
In Re the Minnesota Pub. Utils. Comm'n's Initiation of Summary Investigation, 417 N.W.2d 274 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). “* * * * * * The concept clearly includes bribery of a judge or the employment of counsel in order to bring an improper influence on the court.”
Marriage of Angier v. Angier, 415 N.W.2d 53 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). “Haydock, Minnesota Practice, § 60.24 (1985). Dissolution judgments have been vacated, for “fraud upon the court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.