Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 607.01 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1974 c 394 s 11]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases, 1949–2015 · leading case: Jane Doe 136 v. Ralph Liebsch, 872 N.W.2d 875 (Minn. 2015).
Jane Doe 136 v. Ralph Liebsch, 872 N.W.2d 875 (Minn. 2015). “2006) (stating that the district court has broad discretion when ruling on evidentiary matters).”
Sanitary Farm Dairies, Inc. v. Wolf, 112 N.W.2d 42 (Minn. 1961). “Section 607.01 provides: "Costs in the supreme court may be allowed, in the discretion of the court, as follows: "(1) To the prevailing party, upon a judgment in his favor on the merits, not exceeding $25; * * * * * "In all cases the prevailing party shall be allowed his…”
Vill. of Edina v. Joseph, 119 N.W.2d 809 (Minn. 1962). “In the alternative they contend that if costs and disbursements are to be taxed against them, such costs and disbursements should be proportionately allotted among them. They state that the appeal involved the right to assess specific parcels of property owned by each of them.”
Vill. of Blaine v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 12, 138 N.W.2d 32 (Minn. 1965). “Section 607.01 thereof stated in part: “In all cases the prevailing party shall be allowed his disbursements necessarily paid or incurred.”
State Ex Rel. South St. Paul v. Hetherington, 61 N.W.2d 737 (Minn. 1953). “Clearly plaintiffs prevailed, although the relief afforded them was not in the particular form which they had sought or expected.”
Vill. of Blaine v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 12, 121 N.W.2d 183 (Minn. 1963). “Section 607.01 provides: “Costs in the supreme court may be allowed, in the discretion of the court, as follows: “(1) To the prevailing party, upon a judgment in his favor on the merits, not exceeding $25; * * * * * “In all cases the prevailing party shall be allowed his…”
Loth v. Loth, 35 N.W.2d 542 (Minn. 1949). “(2d) 9 , this court is vested by the statute (§ 607.01) in divorce cases the same as in others with discretion as to whether the prevailing party shall be awarded statutory costs, but not as to “disbursements necessarily paid or incurred.”
Lemmer v. Batzli Elec. Co., 125 N.W.2d 434 (Minn. 1963). “4, provides the rule regarding costs and disbursements on certiorari in workmen’s compensation proceedings as follows: “On review by the supreme court upon certiorari, costs and disbursements shall be taxed as they are upon appeals in civil actions.”
State v. Gannons Inc., 145 N.W.2d 321 (Minn. 1966). “8 were enacted at the same time, we must assume that the legislature had no intention that clause (d) should bring about any change in the method of taxing costs in the supreme court.”
Henderson v. Nw. Airlines, Inc., 43 N.W.2d 786 (Minn. 1950). “§ 607.01. An appellant is the prevailing party if the judgment or order from which the appeal was taken is reversed or is modified.”
Konantz v. Stein, 167 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 1969). “Although we do not see from the present record how liability can be imposed on this defendant, we believe that the interests of justice will be served if the claims of Mrs.”
Molto v. Molto, 64 N.W.2d 154 (Minn. 1954). “§ 607.01. The language of this statute plainly gives this court no discretion in the allowance, disallowance, or apportionment of disbursements necessarily paid or incurred.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.