Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 609.2111 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) For purposes of sections 609.2111 to 609.2114, the terms defined in this subdivision have the meanings given them.

(b) "Motor vehicle" has the meaning given in section 609.52, subdivision 1, and includes attached trailers.

(c) "Controlled substance" has the meaning given in section 152.01, subdivision 4.

(d) "Intoxicating substance" has the meaning given in section 169A.03, subdivision 11a.

(e) "Qualified prior driving offense" includes a prior conviction:

(1) for a violation of section 169A.20 under the circumstances described in section 169A.24 or 169A.25;

(2) under section 609.2112, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), clauses (2) to (6); 609.2113, subdivision 1, clauses (2) to (6); 2, clauses (2) to (6); or 3, clauses (2) to (6); or 609.2114, subdivision 1, paragraph (a), clauses (2) to (6); or 2, clauses (2) to (6);

(3) under Minnesota Statutes 2012, section 609.21, subdivision 1, clauses (2) to (6); or

(4) under Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 609.21, subdivision 1, clauses (2) to (6); 2, clauses (2) to (6); 2a, clauses (2) to (6); 2b, clauses (2) to (6); 3, clauses (2) to (6); or 4, clauses (2) to (6).

(f) "Artificially derived cannabinoid" has the meaning given in section 342.01, subdivision 6.

(g) "Cannabis flower" has the meaning given in section 342.01, subdivision 16.

(h) "Cannabis product" has the meaning given in section 342.01, subdivision 20.

(i) "Hemp-derived consumer product" has the meaning given in section 342.01, subdivision 37.

(j) "Lower-potency hemp edible" has the meaning given in section 342.01, subdivision 50.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2017–2017 · leading case: State v. Boecker, 893 N.W.2d 348 (Minn. 2017).
State v. Boecker, 893 N.W.2d 348 (Minn. 2017). · cites it 4× “1 (2008); Minn. Stat. §§ 609.2111 -.2114 (2016). Under the State’s interpretation, when a person has a prior criminal vehicular operation conviction under one of the three versions of the statute, and that person is later charged with a DWI offense, that charge can be enhanced…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.