Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 609.3641 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1985 c 286 s 24]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 42
cases, 1982–2010 · leading case: State v. Becker, 351 N.W.2d 923 (Minn. 1984).
State v. Becker, 351 N.W.2d 923 (Minn. 1984). “Minn. Stat. § 609.3641 , subd. 1(1) (1982) provides: “A person is guilty of intrafamilial sexual abuse in the first degree if: (1) He has a familial relation *925 ship to and engages in sexual penetration with a child.”
Adesiji v. State, 384 N.W.2d 908 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “Appellant Babatunde Sunday Adesiji was convicted of two counts of first-degree intrafamilial sexual abuse in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.3641, subd. 1(1), and id.”
State v. Shamp, 422 N.W.2d 520 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). “See Minn.Stat. § 609.3641 (Supp.1981). The first degree intrafamilial sexual abuse statute later was repealed and consolidated with the statutes covering criminal sexual conduct.”
State v. Anderson, 394 N.W.2d 813 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “Gary Daniel Anderson appeals from a criminal conviction for violation of Minn. Stat. § 609.3641 , subd. l(2)(e) (1984), intra-familial sexual abuse in the first degree.”
United States v. Sonnenberg, 628 F.3d 361 (7th Cir. 2010). “The 1985 conviction was for a violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.3641 (1963), which provided in full: A person is guilty of intrafamilial sexual abuse in the first degree if: (1) He has a familial relationship to and engages in sexual penetration with a child; or (2) He has a…”
State v. Myers, 359 N.W.2d 604 (Minn. 1984). “343(a) (1982), and intrafamilial sexual abuse in the first and second degrees, Minn.Stat. §§ 609.3641, subd. 1(1), 609.3642, subd.”
Rairdon v. State, 557 N.W.2d 318 (Minn. 1996). “In 1986, appellant John Albert Rairdon pleaded guilty to first- and second-degree intrafamilial sexual abuse, Minn.Stat. §§ 609.3641, subd. l(2)(e), 609.”
State v. Abrahamson, 758 N.W.2d 332 (Minn. Ct. App. 2008). “In Raii-don, the district court imposed consecutive sentences on convictions of first- and second-degree intrafamilial sexual abuse in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 609.3641, subd. l(2)(e), 609.”
State v. Jahnke, 353 N.W.2d 606 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). “1(1) (1982), and two counts of intrafamilial sexual abuse in the first degree in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.3641, subd. 1 and 609.05 (1982).”
State v. Van Ruler, 378 N.W.2d 77 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “At his arraignment on October 8, 1984, appellant pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea agreement to four counts of intrafamilial sexual abuse in the first degree under Minn.Stat. § 609.3641, subd. 1(1) (1984).”
State v. Rud, 359 N.W.2d 573 (Minn. 1984). “1984) (holding that in a prosecution for intrafamilial sexual abuse on the basis of multi-pie acts over an extended period of time, Minn. Stat. § 609.3641 , subd. l(2)(e) (1982), the complaint was defective because it failed to state a reasonably specific time period in which…”
State v. Brusven, 327 N.W.2d 591 (Minn. 1982). “The defendant, who is now 29, pleaded guilty to intra-familial sexual abuse in the first degree, Minn.Stat. § 609.3641, subd. 1(2)(e) (Supp.”
— Minn. Stat. § 609.3641(1) — 1 case
United States v. Sonnenberg, 628 F.3d 361 (7th Cir. 2010). “The 1985 conviction was for a violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.3641 (1963), which provided in full: A person is guilty of intrafamilial sexual abuse in the first degree if: (1) He has a familial relationship to and engages in sexual penetration with a child; or (2) He has a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.