§
Subdivision 1.Court determination.
If at any time after the state public defender or a district public defender has been directed to act, the court having jurisdiction in the matter is satisfied that the defendant or other person is financially able to obtain counsel, the court shall terminate the appointment of the public defender. The judicial district may investigate the financial status of a defendant or other person for whom a public defender has been appointed and may act to collect payments directed by the court.
If at any time after appointment a public defender should have reason to believe that a defendant is financially able to obtain counsel or to make partial payment for counsel, it shall be the public defender's duty to so advise the court so that appropriate action may be taken.
§
Subd. 2.Partial payment.
If the court determines that the defendant is able to make partial payment, the court shall direct the partial payments to the state general fund. Payments directed by the court to the state shall be recorded by the court administrator who shall transfer the payments to the commissioner of management and budget.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
8
cases, 1981–2011 · leading case:
State v. Craig, 807 N.W.2d 453 (Minn. Ct. App. 2011).
State v. Craig, 807 N.W.2d 453 (Minn. Ct. App. 2011).
· cites it 9× “Appellant argues that the imposition of the copayment should be reversed because the district court did not make specific findings regarding his ability to pay under Minn.Stat. § 611.20, subd. 2, and Minn. R.”
State v. Jones, 772 N.W.2d 496 (Minn. 2009).
· cites it 4× “See Minn. Stat. § 611.20 , subd. 4 (2008); Minn.”
State v. Cunningham, 663 N.W.2d 7 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003).
· cites it 12× “In addition to the $28 co-payment, because appellants Sommerlot, Peterson, and Cunningham were employed, they were each ordered to reimburse the public defender $20 under Minn.Stat. § 611.20, subd. 4 (2002). Appellant Spratley agreed to waive her right to a speedy trial in…”
Foster v. State, 416 N.W.2d 835 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987).
· cites it 12× “See Minn.Stat. § 611.20 (1986). The courts also have the statutory authority to order reimbursement of public defender costs as a condition of probation.”
Thompson v. Est. of Petroff, 319 N.W.2d 400 (Minn. 1982).
“1981), we applied the Iowa survival statute, Iowa Code § 611.20 (1980), which provides for the survival of all causes of action, noting that it was the better rule of law because it acknowledged the “essentially compensatory” nature of tort causes of action.”
State v. Sargent, 355 N.W.2d 179 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984).
· cites it 4× “total of $120 to the public defender fund as a condition of staying the fines for all four convictions must be vacated. The record does not show appellant ever agreed to reimburse the public defender fund as part of the plea agreement.”
Bigelow v. Halloran, 313 N.W.2d 10 (Minn. 1981).
“2d 408 (1973), that Iowa’s survival statute, Iowa Code § 611.20 , is applicable thus allowing the survival of plaintiff’s cause of action.”
State v. Larson, 374 N.W.2d 329 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985).
· cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 611.20 (1984). The trial court’s summary appropriation of the bail deposit was arbitrary.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.