Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 626.09 (2026)
Examination Of Parties Making Request
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The court may, before issuing the warrant, examine on oath the person seeking the warrant and any witnesses the person may produce. It shall take the affidavits in writing, and cause them to be subscribed to by the party or parties making them.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1968–2013 · leading case: State v. Lindsey, 473 N.W.2d 857 (Minn. 1991).
State v. Lindsey, 473 N.W.2d 857 (Minn. 1991). “Those are the same objectives advanced by Minn.Stat. § 626.09 (1990) which requires that affidavits be in writing.”
Clay, Sara Kathrine, 391 S.W.3d 94 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). “1991); See Minn. Stat. 626.09 (providing that the magistrate "shall take the affidavits in writing, and cause them to be subscribed to by the party or parties making them").”
State v. Meizo, 297 N.W.2d 126 (Minn. 1980). “) The statutory section on oral testimony, Minn.Stat. § 626.09 (1978), provides: "The court or justice of the peace may, before issuing the warrant, examine on oath the person seeking the warrant and any witnesses he may produce, and must take his affidavit or their affidavits…”
State v. Raines, 709 N.W.2d 273 (Minn. Ct. App. 2006). “Appellant's brief refers to Minn.Stat. § 626.09 (allowing the district court to examine under oath any person seeking a warrant).”
State v. Campbell, 161 N.W.2d 47 (Minn. 1968). “” § 626.09 provides: “The court or justice of the peace may, before issuing the warrant, examine on oath the person seeking the warrant and any witnesses he may produce, and must take his affidavit or their affidavits in writing, and cause same to be subscribed by the party or…”
State v. Lindsey, 460 N.W.2d 632 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990). “The magistrate may receive sworn oral testimony, Minn.Stat. § 626.09 (1988), but “[t]he affidavit or affidavits must set forth the facts tending to establish the grounds of the application.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.