Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 626.14 (2026)

Time And Manner Of Service; No-Knock Search Warrants

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Time.

A search warrant may be served only between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. unless the court determines on the basis of facts stated in the affidavits that a nighttime search outside those hours is necessary to prevent the loss, destruction, or removal of the objects of the search or to protect the searchers or the public. The search warrant shall state that it may be served only between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. unless a nighttime search outside those hours is authorized.

Subd. 2.Definition.

For the purposes of this section, "no-knock search warrant" means a search warrant authorizing peace officers to enter certain premises without first loudly and understandably announcing the officer's presence or purpose and waiting an objectively reasonable amount of time thereafter for the occupant to comply, based on a totality of the circumstances, prior to entering the premises.

Subd. 2a.No-knock search warrants.

A court may not issue or approve a no-knock search warrant unless the judge determines that the applicant has articulated specific, objective facts that establish probable cause for belief that:

(1) the search cannot be executed while the premises is unoccupied; and

(2) the occupant or occupants in the premises present an imminent threat of death or great bodily harm to the officers executing the warrant or other persons.

Subd. 3.Requirements for a no-knock search warrant.

(a) No peace officer shall seek a no-knock search warrant unless the warrant application includes at a minimum:

(1) all documentation and materials the issuing court requires;

(2) the information specified in paragraph (b); and

(3) a sworn affidavit as provided in section 626.08.

(b) Each warrant application seeking a no-knock entry must include, in detailed terms, the following:

(1) why peace officers are seeking the use of a no-knock entry and are unable to detain the suspect or search the premises safely through the use of a knock and announce warrant;

(2) what investigative activities have taken place to support issuance of the no-knock search warrant, or why no investigative activity is needed or able to be performed;

(3) the known or suspected occupant or occupants of the premises, including the number of occupants under age 18; and

(4) whether the warrant can be effectively executed during daylight hours according to subdivision 1.

(c) The chief law enforcement officer or designee and another superior officer must review and approve each warrant application. The agency must document the approval of both reviewing parties.

(d) A no-knock search warrant shall not be issued when the only crime alleged is possession of a controlled substance unless there is probable cause to believe that the controlled substance is for other than personal use.

Subd. 4.Reporting requirements regarding no-knock search warrants.

(a) Law enforcement agencies shall report to the commissioner of public safety regarding the use of no-knock search warrants in a format prescribed by the commissioner. An agency must report the use of a no-knock search warrant to the commissioner no later than three months after the date the warrant was issued. The report shall include the following information:

(1) the number of no-knock search warrants requested;

(2) the number of no-knock search warrants the court issued;

(3) the number of no-knock search warrants executed;

(4) the number of injuries and fatalities suffered, if any, by peace officers and by civilians in the execution of no-knock search warrants; and

(5) any other information the commissioner requests.

(b) The commissioner of public safety shall report the information provided under paragraph (a) annually to the chairs and ranking minority members of the legislative committees with jurisdiction over public safety.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1980–2025 · leading case: State v. Jackson, 742 N.W.2d 163 (Minn. 2007).
State v. Jackson, 742 N.W.2d 163 (Minn. 2007). · cites it 156× “Based on the foregoing facts in his affidavit, Scherf requested a search warrant authorizing the police to conduct a nighttime search as provided for under Minn. Stat. § 626.14 (2006). In support of the nighttime search authorization, Scherf also stated in the affidavit that…”
State v. Bourke, 718 N.W.2d 922 (Minn. 2006). · cites it 27× “Bourke contends that the search warrant application did not contain specific facts to justify a nighttime search as required by the constitution and Minn.Stat. § 626.14 (2004). The court of appeals affirmed the district court.”
State v. Jordan, 742 N.W.2d 149 (Minn. 2007). · cites it 32× “Minn.Stat. § 626.14 (2006). [3] The state concedes that the statute was violated because the application for the warrant was insufficient to support a nighttime search.”
State v. Goodwin, 686 N.W.2d 40 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 6× “Minn.Stat. § 626.14 (2000) states: A search warrant may be served only between the hours of 7:00 a.”
State v. Amundson, 712 N.W.2d 560 (Minn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 8× “" Minn.Stat. § 626.14 (2002). Nighttime searches are discouraged because they generally involve "a much greater intrusion upon privacy and [are] presumably more alarming than an ordinary daytime search of a home.”
State v. Mike, 919 N.W.2d 103 (Minn. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 4× “Jordan , based on the state's failure to comply with Minn. Stat. § 626.14 (2006), which restricts execution of a search warrant between the hours of 8:00 p.”
State v. Winchell, 363 N.W.2d 747 (Minn. 1985). · cites it 2× “The legislature recognized that entry into a residence in the middle of the night is a greater invasion of residential privacy than entry during the daytime in Minn.Stat. § 626.14 (1984), which provides that search warrants shall be served only in the daytime unless the issuing…”
Scott v. State, 782 A.2d 862 (Md. 2001). “276, § 2 (2001) (requiring judicial approval and reasonable cause for nighttime search); Minn.Stat. § 626.14 (2000) (requiring that the court determine that a nighttime search is necessary to prevent the loss, destruction, or removal of the objects of the search); Neb.”
State v. Quick, 659 N.W.2d 701 (Minn. 2003). · cites it 3× “Minn.Stat. § 626.14 (2002). In this case, both the house and Quick's vehicle in the driveway were part of a crime scene.”
State v. Jordan, 726 N.W.2d 534 (Minn. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 5× “ISSUE Did the district court err in suppressing evidence obtained during the execution of *537 a nighttime search warrant held to be invalid under Minn.Stat. § 626.14 (2004), when respondent was not present at the time law enforcement executed the- warrant? ANALYSIS “When…”
Laymon v. Minnesota Premier Props., LLC, 903 N.W.2d 6 (Minn. Ct. App. 2017). “subject to the provisions - of sections 626.14 and 524.2-402, the allowances provided for by sections 524.”
State v. Ailport, 412 N.W.2d 35 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 626.14 (1986) requires daytime searches unless the affidavits show that a nighttime search “is necessary to prevent the loss, destruction, or removal of the objects of the search.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.