Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 626.5561 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 2018 [Repealed, 1Sp2020 c 2 art 7 s 39]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1997–2014 · leading case: Bol v. Cole, 561 N.W.2d 143 (Minn. 1997).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Bol v. Cole, 561 N.W.2d 143 (Minn. 1997). · cites it 4× “The Child Abuse Reporting Act grants immunity to certain persons who report suspected abuse in good faith: The following persons are immune from any civil or criminal liability that otherwise might result from their actions, if they are acting in good faith: (1) any person…”

Kuelbs v. Williams, 609 N.W.2d 10 (Minn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 6× “The statute, in relevant part, provides that: (a) The following persons are immune from any civil or criminal liability that otherwise might result from their actions, if they are acting in good faith: (1) any person making a voluntary or mandated report under subdivision 3 or…”

S.F. v. Clay Cnty. (Minn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 8× “” Minn. Stat. § 626.5561 , subd. 1(b). 8 For these reasons, we conclude that the district court erred by determining that the abuse/neglect report was both personnel and welfare data, and we hold that it was improper for the county to use the report for a personnel matter.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.