Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 628.30 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1979 c 233 s 42]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1962–1970 · leading case: State v. Hall, 176 N.W.2d 254 (Minn. 1970).
State v. Hall, 176 N.W.2d 254 (Minn. 1970). “28 refers to indictments, § 628.30 provides that all provisions relating to indictments shall govern a prosecution by information.”
State Ex Rel. Lacklineo v. Tahash, 126 N.W.2d 646 (Minn. 1964). “11, read in conjunction with § 628.30, explicitly requires that the information must be read to an accused unless a reading is waived.”
State Ex Rel. Webber v. Tahash, 152 N.W.2d 497 (Minn. 1967). “Both the complaint and the information were in the first instance fatally defective. The question is whether the original information was sufficient to confer jurisdiction.”
State v. Moosbrugger, 116 N.W.2d 68 (Minn. 1962). “11 § 628.30; see, State ex rel. Adams v. Rigg, 252 Minn.”
State v. Fraser, 152 N.W.2d 731 (Minn. 1967). “” Section 628.30 provides that all provisions of law relating to indictments and for testing the validity thereof apply as well to informations.”
State v. Schultz, 136 N.W.2d 534 (Minn. 1965). “10 in forging a check, thereby misleading or placing him in double jeopardy; and (2) due process was denied to him because counsel had failed to attack the information for duplicity.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.