Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 62A.09 (2026)

Limitation

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Nothing in sections 62A.01, 62A.02, 62A.03, 62A.04, 62A.05, 62A.06, 62A.07, and 62A.08 shall apply to or affect:

(1) any policy of workers' compensation insurance or any policy of casualty or fire and allied lines insurance with or without supplementary coverage therein; or

(2) any policy or contract of reinsurance; or

(3) any group policy of insurance, except when specifically referred to; or

(4) life insurance, endowment or annuity contracts, or contracts supplemental thereto which contain only such provisions relating to accident and sickness insurance as (a) provide additional benefits in case of death or dismemberment or loss of sight by accident, or as (b) operate to safeguard such contracts against lapse or to give a special surrender value or special benefit or an annuity in the event that the insured or annuitant shall become totally and permanently disabled, as defined by the contract or supplemental contract.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2014–2016 · leading case: Lora Walker v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins, 831 F.3d 968 (8th Cir. 2016).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Lora Walker v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins, 831 F.3d 968 (8th Cir. 2016). · cites it 3× “Equal Protection Walker argues “that if Minn. Stat. § 62A.09 (limitations) is interpreted to mean that insureds under group policies are not afforded the same protections as insureds under individual policies, it would *976 violate the equal protection clause of both the…”

Bolin v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins., 28 F. Supp. 3d 915 (D. Minnesota 2014). · cites it 2× “Moreover, under Minn.Stat. § 62A.09, "[n]othing in [§§ 62A.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.