Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 62E.16 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 2013 c 84 art 1 s 94]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1980–1991 · leading case: Helmin v. Griswold Ribbon & Typewriter, 345 N.W.2d 257 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984).
Helmin v. Griswold Ribbon & Typewriter, 345 N.W.2d 257 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 6× “See Minn.Stat. § 62E.16 (1982). Since more than 30 days had already passed, (Jan.”
Insurers' Action Council, Inc. v. Markman, 490 F. Supp. 921 (D. Minnesota 1980). · cites it 7× “Minn.Stat. § 62E.16. The magistrate recommended that the Act be declared unconstitutional on due process, impairment of contract, equal protection, and commerce clause grounds.”
St. Paul Elec. Workers Welfare Fund v. Markman, 490 F. Supp. 931 (D. Minnesota 1980). · cites it 2× “In addition self-insurers must include in their plans of insurance, a continuation provision permitting resident employee insureds to continue coverage for up to six months after termination of employment, Minn.Stat. §§ 62E.16, 62A.16 and 62A.17, and a conversion privilege,…”
Stasny ex rel. Stasny v. Minnesota Dep't of Com., 474 N.W.2d 195 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 43× “Minn.Stat. § 62E.16 (1978) addresses an insurer’s duty to offer individual conversion policies upon termination of a group health policy by the insurance provider.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.