Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 631.03 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1979 c 233 s 42]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1960–2011 · leading case: Santiago v. State, 644 N.W.2d 425 (Minn. 2002).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Santiago v. State, 644 N.W.2d 425 (Minn. 2002). · cites it 12× “Laws 1477 (codified at Minn.Stat. § 631.03 (1969)). The amended statute permitted joinder in the interest of justice, but continued the policy of strongly favoring separate trials.”

State v. Heiges, 806 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 2011). · cites it 2× “Confessions Under Minn.Stat. § 631.03? It is undisputed that Heiges’s statements to Detective Pfaff constitute confessions under Minn.”

State v. Duncan, 250 N.W.2d 189 (Minn. 1977). · cites it 3× “1974, § 631.03, 1 which was in effect at the time of the appellant’s trial, provided: “When two or more defendants shall be jointly indicted or informed against for a felony, they shall be tried separately provided, however, upon written motion, the court, in the interest of…”

State v. Martineau, 101 N.W.2d 410 (Minn. 1960). “Regarding joint trial, § 631.03 provides in part: “When two or more defendants shall be jointly indicted for a felony, any defendant who shall require it shall be tried separately.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.