Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 631. CRIMINAL TRIAL; CONVICTION; SENTENCE
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 631.07 (2026)

Order Of Final Argument

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When the giving of evidence is concluded in a criminal trial, unless the case is submitted on both sides without argument, the prosecution may make a closing argument to the jury. The defense may then make its closing argument to the jury. The prosecution shall then have the right to reply in rebuttal to the closing argument of the defense.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1964–2025 · leading case: State v. Breaux, 620 N.W.2d 326 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Breaux, 620 N.W.2d 326 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 19× “Appellant further challenges the court’s ruling allowing the prosecutor to make a rebuttal argument pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 631.07 (Supp.1999). Finally, appellant asserts there was insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction.”
State v. Mitchell, 130 N.W.2d 128 (Minn. 1964). “It does not seem to us that § 631.07 presents an obstacle to the protection of the state’s rights in a criminal trial, and there is no reason why the procedure with reference to this issue could not be established by ground rules agreed upon and determined by counsel and the…”
Cappelli v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n (D. Minnesota 2025). · cites it 28× “Section 631.07(1) (2024). However, Wisconsin law does not automatically render a policy invalid for lack of an insurable interest.”
Est. of Jacqueline Hopfinger v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n (D. Minnesota 2025). · cites it 27× “§ 631.07 (1) (2024). However, Wisconsin law does not automatically render a policy invalid for lack of an insurable interest.”
Est. of John C. Breslin v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n (D. Minnesota 2025). · cites it 27× “§ 631.07 (1) (2024). However, Wisconsin law does not automatically render a policy invalid for lack of an insurable interest.”
Est. of Susan Jacobs v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n (D. Minnesota 2025). · cites it 27× “§ 631.07 (1) (2024). However, Wisconsin law does not automatically render a policy invalid for lack of an insurable interest.”
— Minn. Stat. § 631.07(1) — 1 case
Cappelli v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n (D. Minnesota 2025). “Section 631.07(1) (2024). However, Wisconsin law does not automatically render a policy invalid for lack of an insurable interest.”
— Minn. Stat. § 631.07(4) — 4 cases
Cappelli v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n (D. Minnesota 2025). “Section 631.07(1) (2024). However, Wisconsin law does not automatically render a policy invalid for lack of an insurable interest.”
Est. of Jacqueline Hopfinger v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n (D. Minnesota 2025). “§ 631.07 (1) (2024). However, Wisconsin law does not automatically render a policy invalid for lack of an insurable interest.”
Est. of John C. Breslin v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n (D. Minnesota 2025). “§ 631.07 (1) (2024). However, Wisconsin law does not automatically render a policy invalid for lack of an insurable interest.”
Est. of Susan Jacobs v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n (D. Minnesota 2025). “§ 631.07 (1) (2024). However, Wisconsin law does not automatically render a policy invalid for lack of an insurable interest.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.