Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 631. CRIMINAL TRIAL; CONVICTION; SENTENCE
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 631.18 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1979 c 233 s 42]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1963–1980 · leading case: Jackson v. Indiana, 406 U.S. 715 (1972).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Jackson v. Indiana, 406 U.S. 715 (1972). “§ 54-40 (c) (1958); Minn. Stat. Ann. § 631.18 (Supp. 1972-1973); N.”
State v. Dhaemers, 150 N.W.2d 61 (Minn. 1967). · cites it 2× “Section 631.18, so far as material, reads: “When any person under indictment or information, and before or during the trial thereon and before verdict is rendered, shall be found to be insane, * * * the court * * * shall forthwith commit him to the proper state hospital * * *…”
State v. Bauer, 299 N.W.2d 493 (Minn. 1980). · cites it 2× “The defendant seeks to directly apply the holding of Jackson to his case, claiming that he has been incarcerated as an incompetent defendant pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 631.18 (1978) (repealed 1979).”
Dhaemers v. State, 175 N.W.2d 457 (Minn. 1970). · cites it 5× “On the other hand, § 631.18 was determinative in the first Dhaemers case, and nothing has appeared in the instant appeal to change that.”
State v. Fontana, 152 N.W.2d 503 (Minn. 1967). “§ 631.18. The board found defendant to be “in a state of insanity so as to be incapable of understanding the criminal proceedings against him and in cooperating in his defense.”
State Ex Rel. Riendeau v. Tahash, 148 N.W.2d 557 (Minn. 1967). “1 Finady, under the authority of § 631.18 and 611.026, on October 9, upon the motion of the county attorney, the district court ordered relator examined by the probate court to determine whether he was mentady competent to stand trial.”
State Ex Rel. Dillard v. Tahash, 121 N.W.2d 602 (Minn. 1963). · cites it 4× “” The particular complaint of the relator is that the court-appointed counsel should have, before sentence, requested the court to provide a mental examination of him pursuant to the provisions of § 631.18. 3 *326 We find no merit to this claim.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.