Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 645.12 (2026)

Posted Notice

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Definition.

The term "posted notice," when used in reference to the giving of notice in any proceeding or the service of any summons, order, or process in judicial proceedings, means the posting, at the beginning of the prescribed period of notice, of a copy of the notice or document referred to, in a manner likely to attract attention, in each of three of the most public places in the town, city, district, or county to which the subject matter of the notice relates, or in which the thing of which notice is given is to occur or to be performed.

Subd. 2.Posting; large number of similar notices in same proceeding.

Posting, posting in a conspicuous place, or conspicuously posting shall, when the number of notices of like nature in the same proceeding is so large that it would be impractical to affix the notices separately to a wall, post, or bulletin board, include placing the notices in a loose leaf binder or binders with a statement of the contents on the outside thereof, which shall be kept on a table or counter in the designated place of posting, provided that such notices shall be accessible and subject to inspection by the public at all times.

Subd. 3.Posting; large number of licenses issued to same person.

Posting, posting in a conspicuous place, or conspicuously posting shall, when the number of licenses issued to the same person, persons, copartnership, or corporation is so large that it would be impractical to affix the licenses separately to a wall, post, or fixture, include placing such licenses in a series of open face envelopes with a statement of the contents on the outside thereof, which shall be prominently displayed, provided that such licenses shall be accessible and subject to inspection at all times.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1974–2006 · leading case: Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs., Inc., 716 N.W.2d 634 (Minn. 2006).
Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs., Inc., 716 N.W.2d 634 (Minn. 2006). · cites it 4× “2000) ("[I]f the words of the statute are `clear and free from all ambiguity,' further construction is neither necessary nor permitted" (quoting Minn.Stat. § 645.12 (2004))). We have specifically noted with regard to section 541.”
Fid. & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Riopelle, 216 N.W.2d 674 (Minn. 1974). · cites it 2× “If our statutes require compliance with § 645.12, subd. 1, the sale would be invalid since the defect would appear on the face of the return of service, which detailed the marshal’s actions with respect to posting copies of the notice of sale.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.