Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 645. INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES AND RULES
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 645.15 (2026)

Computation Of Time

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Where the performance or doing of any act, duty, matter, payment, or thing is ordered or directed, and the period of time or duration for the performance or doing thereof is prescribed and fixed by law, the time, except as otherwise provided in sections 645.13 and 645.14, shall be computed so as to exclude the first and include the last day of the prescribed or fixed period or duration of time. When the last day of the period falls on Saturday, Sunday, or a legal holiday, that day shall be omitted from the computation.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 28 cases, 1947–2018 · leading case: Jorgensen v. Knutson, 662 N.W.2d 893 (Minn. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Jorgensen v. Knutson, 662 N.W.2d 893 (Minn. 2003). · cites it 102× “The court used the computation method described in Minn.Stat. § 645.15 (2002) to determine that the ten-days' notice of cancellation required under Minn.”
State v. Wertheimer, 781 N.W.2d 158 (Minn. 2010). · cites it 67× “The parties dispute whether we should apply Minn.Stat. § 645.15 (2008) — a time computation statute — -to determine the bounds of the ten-year period.”
Rickert v. State, 795 N.W.2d 236 (Minn. 2011). · cites it 8× “" Minn.Stat. § 645.15 (2010); see also State v.”
Jason Donald Matakis v. State of Minnesota, 862 N.W.2d 33 (Minn. 2015). · cites it 4× “” Minn. Stat. § 645.15 (2014). Therefore, the statute of limitations expired on Monday, May 13, 2013.”
Tollefson Dev., Inc. v. City of Elk River, 665 N.W.2d 554 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 6× “2000) (citing Minn.Stat. § 645.15, which states that if last day of relevant period falls on Sunday, period continues to next day), review denied (Minn.”
Career Resources, Inc. v. Pearson Candy Co., 435 N.W.2d 114 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 9× “Minn.Stat. § 645.15 (1986). Although section 645.”
Jorgensen v. Knutson, 643 N.W.2d 615 (Minn. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 11× “The district court denied appellant’s motion and granted partial summary judgment, concluding that the cancellation notice was void because Minn.Stat. § 645.15 (2000) applies to insurance policy cancellation notices.”
Gallaher v. Titler, 812 N.W.2d 897 (Minn. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 18× “03 must be computed in accordance with Minn.Stat. § 645.15 (2010). See Kokesh v.”
Petition of Nelson, 495 N.W.2d 200 (Minn. 1993). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 645.15 (1992). 3 Late in the afternoon of April 8, 1991, Stangel’s attorney received the redemption amount from his client.”
Veit Co. v. Lake Cnty., 707 N.W.2d 725 (Minn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “2000) (citing Minn.Stat. § 645.15). 2 . Under Minn.Stat.”
Twp. Bd. v. Lewis, 234 N.W.2d 815 (Minn. 1975). · cites it 4× “We quoted § 645.15 and stated ( 224 Minn. 85 , 27 N.”
State v. Jackson, 557 N.W.2d 552 (Minn. 1996). · cites it 3× “Keith Chief Justice MEMORANDUM Minnesota Statute § 645.15 sets forth the general approach to computing time with respect to filing papers, etc.”
Show all 28 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.