Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 648.36 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1984 c 480 s 22]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1968–2014 · leading case: Minnesota Express, Inc. v. Travelers Ins. Co., 333 N.W.2d 871 (Minn. 1983).
Minnesota Express, Inc. v. Travelers Ins. Co., 333 N.W.2d 871 (Minn. 1983). · cites it 2× “Although this court is not permitted to consider the caption as part of the statute— Minn.Stat. § 648.36 (1982) — the headings are relevant to legislative intent where they were present in the bill during the legislative process.”
Rippentrop v. Imperial Chem. Co., 316 N.W.2d 514 (Minn. 1982). · cites it 2× “…1 . “Compensation during rehabilitation,” the headnote appearing in the statute, is not part of the statute. See Minn.Stat. § 648.36 (1980).”
Matter of Contest of Gen. Election, 264 N.W.2d 401 (Minn. 1978). · cites it 2× “07; and he maintains a bill-drafting department which, upon request, drafts or aids in drafting bills for members of the legislature and others, which drafts, subject to the provisions of § 648.”
Manty v. Johnson (In re Johnson), 509 B.R. 213 (8th Cir. BAP 2014). “1983) ("Although this court is not permitted to consider the caption as part of the statute — Minn. Stat. § 648.36 (1982) [now § 645.49] — the headings are relevant to legislative intent where they were present in the bill during the legislative process.”
State v. Bell, 157 N.W.2d 760 (Minn. 1968). · cites it 2× “Section 648.36 reads: “The headnotes of the sections of any edition of the Minnesota Statutes printed in black-face type are intended to be mere catch-words to indicate the contents of the section and are not any part of the statute, nor shall they be so deemed when any of such…”
Nauni Jo Manty v. Grace M. Johnson (8th Cir. BAP 2014). “1983) (“Although this court is not permitted to consider the caption as part of the statute – Minn. Stat. § 648.36 (1982) [now § 645.49] – the headings are relevant to legislative intent where they were present in the bill during the legislative process.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.