Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 65B.22 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1974 c 408 s 33]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases, 1974–1988 · leading case: Anderson v. Illinois Farmers Ins. Co., 269 N.W.2d 702 (Minn. 1978).
Anderson v. Illinois Farmers Ins. Co., 269 N.W.2d 702 (Minn. 1978). “” The trial court determined that the definition of “relative” reduced uninsured-motorist coverage below the statutory requirements and invalidated it.”
Pfeffer v. State Auto. & Cas. Underwriters Ins. Co., 292 N.W.2d 743 (Minn. 1980). “Defendant’s uninsured-motorist insurer then brought suit for subrogation claiming that under Minn.Stat. § 65B.22 subd. 6 (1971) (repealed 1974), 6 it was entitled to recover the uninsured-motorist payments it had paid out to the defendant from the proceeds of the settlement with…”
Halseth v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 268 N.W.2d 730 (Minn. 1978). “1971, § 65B.22, subd. 3, which provided: "No automobile liability * * * policy of insurance * * * shall be delivered or issued for delivery in this state * * * unless coverage is provided therein * * * for the protection of persons insured thereunder who are legally entitled to…”
Gudvangen v. Austin Mut. Ins. Co., 284 N.W.2d 813 (Minn. 1979). “State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co. supra , the present issue does not depend solely upon the location of the insured, but depends additionally upon who was at fault in the accident.”
Holman v. All Nation Ins. Co., 288 N.W.2d 244 (Minn. 1980). “Minn.Stat. § 65B.22 (1971). Under such a statute, we held, the writing itself must demonstrate that the insured’s selection of lower limits was knowing, mindful, and intentional, and that no such knowing selection was manifested by an insurance application form on which the…”
Burgraff v. Aetna Life & Cas. Co., 346 N.W.2d 627 (Minn. 1984). “" Such a policy "means a policy delivered or issued for delivery in this state, insuring a natural person as named insured, and any relative or relatives of the named insured who is a resident of the same household covering automobiles owned by the insured * * *.”
United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Fruchtman, 263 N.W.2d 66 (Minn. 1978). “1971, § 65B.22, subd. 3. It was the answer to these questions which determined whether the merits of the insured’s claim were arbitrable under the policy, and hence whether the arbitrator’s award exceeded the scope of her authority.”
Owens v. Federated Mut. Implement & Hardware Ins. Co., 328 N.W.2d 162 (Minn. 1983). “Minn. Stat. § 65B.22, subd. 8 (1971) (§ 72A.”
Dunshee v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 228 N.W.2d 567 (Minn. 1975). “408, § 33, and replaced by § 65B.49, subd. 4, which is part of the Minnesota No-fault Automobile Insurance Act.”
Milbank Mut. Ins. Co. v. Kluver, 225 N.W.2d 230 (Minn. 1974). “1971, § 65B.22, 1 which required drivers to obtain uninsured-motorist coverage, the operative language of subd.”
Wasche v. Milbank Mut. Ins. Co., 268 N.W.2d 913 (Minn. 1978). “1971, § 65B.22. 9 . In Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Mutual Ins.”
Petrich Ex Rel. Lee v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 414 N.W.2d 558 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). “Hartford contends that the trial court erred in reserving the issue of the identity of the driver for arbitration and seeks a remand of this issue to the trial court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.