Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 65B. AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 65B.25 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1974 c 408 s 33]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1976–2009 · leading case: Dohney v. Allstate Ins. Co., 632 N.W.2d 598 (Minn. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dohney v. Allstate Ins. Co., 632 N.W.2d 598 (Minn. 2001). · cites it 4× “Before the No-Fault Act became effective in 1975, insurers were required to make UIM coverage available to an insured, but insureds were required to affirmatively opt for UIM coverage or they would not receive the benefits.”
Jacobson v. Illinois Farmers Ins. Co., 264 N.W.2d 804 (Minn. 1978). · cites it 5× “St,1971, § 65B.25 by failing to have “made available” underinsured motorist coverage as required by the statute.”
Lick v. Dairyland Ins. Co., 258 N.W.2d 791 (Minn. 1977). · cites it 4× “1971, §§ 65B.25 and 65B.26(d), that insurers make available “underinsured motorist coverage” in every policy of automobile liability insurance.”
Holman v. All Nation Ins. Co., 288 N.W.2d 244 (Minn. 1980). · cites it 2× “1971, § 65B.25 reverses this burden for under insured motorist coverage * *.”
Hastings v. United Pac. Ins. Co., 318 N.W.2d 849 (Minn. 1982). · cites it 2× “6 (1978) (repealed 1980), and to review our application in earlier cases of the provision and its predecessor statute, Minn.Stat. § 65B.25 (1971). We there held that the mailed offering materials in question satisfied section 65B.”
Kuchenmeister v. Illinois Farmers Ins. Co., 310 N.W.2d 86 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 65B.25 (1971) (repealed 1974).”
Forcier v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 310 N.W.2d 124 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 2× “These sections were renumbered in 1971 as Minn. Stat. §§ 65B.25 and 65B.26 (1971). The first of these two sections (§ 72A.”
Randall v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 335 N.W.2d 247 (Minn. 1983). · cites it 2× “6(d) (1978) (repealed 1980) (“shall offer” language) with Minn.Stat. § 65B.25 (1971) (repealed 1974) (“made available” language).”
Johnson v. Cummiskey, 765 N.W.2d 652 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 65B.25 (1971). Under that law, an insured person could not recover under her UIM provision unless the policy’s UIM coverage limits exceeded the amount recovered from the insured tortfeasor.”
Frerich v. Farmers Ins. Grp., 361 N.W.2d 461 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 16× “Appellants sought reformation of their automobile insurance policy claiming respondent did not make underinsured motorist coverage available to them in violation of Minn.Stat. § 65B.25 (1971). Respondent moved for summary judgment.”
Overholt v. McDaniel, 765 F. Supp. 20 (D.D.C. 1991). “2d at 1238 (citing Minn. Stat. §§ 65B.25, 65B.26(d) (1971)).”
Stofferahn v. Great Am. Ins., 244 N.W.2d 160 (Minn. 1976). · cites it 2× “1971, §§ 65B.25 and 65B.26(d), to make available to the village of Oronoco underinsured motorist coverage, which coverage would have compensated Officer Stofferahn for the damages which he sustained in excess of the $20,000 he recovered from Hoeft.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.