Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 65B.491 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Renumbered 65B.44, subd 3a]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1999–2016 · leading case: Am. Fam. Ins. Grp. v. Schroedl, 616 N.W.2d 273 (Minn. 2000).
Am. Fam. Ins. Grp. v. Schroedl, 616 N.W.2d 273 (Minn. 2000). “In addition, the arbitrator noted that American Family had not complied with its responsibility under Minn.Stat. § 65B.491 to inquire about Schroedl’s need for wage loss reimbursement coverage.”
Olson v. Am. Fam. Mut. Ins. Co., 636 N.W.2d 598 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001). “The Schroedl court interpreted Minn.Stat. § 65B.491 (1998), which states: Senior Citizens After August 1, 1987, no plan of reparation security issued to or renewed with a person who has attained the age of 65 years may provide coverage for wage loss reimbursement that the…”
Am. Fam. Ins. Grp. v. Schroedl, 598 N.W.2d 704 (Minn. Ct. App. 1999). “The arbitrator determined that appellant’s 1992 decision to exclude work loss coverage did not relieve respondent of its responsibility, under Minn.Stat. § 65B.491 (1998), to re-determine, upon each policy renewal, if such an exclusion was appropriate.”
Cnty. of Ramsey v. MERSCORP Holdings, Inc., 962 F. Supp. 2d 1082 (D. Minnesota 2013). “34 in the larger context of the Recording Act reinforces that the legislature did not intend to create a mandatory recording obligation.”
Founders Ins. Co. v. James Yates, 876 N.W.2d 344 (Minn. Ct. App. 2016). “2000) (construing Minnesota Statutes section 65B.491 (1998), in conjunction with Minnesotá Statutes section 65B.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.