Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 7.11 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Renumbered 16A.015]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1977–2022 · leading case: Lick v. Dairyland Ins. Co., 258 N.W.2d 791 (Minn. 1977).
Lick v. Dairyland Ins. Co., 258 N.W.2d 791 (Minn. 1977). · cites it 2× “If “uninsured” is not so defined, then an individual with uninsured motorist coverage who is injured by an uninsured motorist would be better off than an individual with the same coverage who is injured by one fully insured but under the laws of a jurisdiction whose minimum…”
State v. Thompson, 544 N.W.2d 8 (Minn. 1996). “2 La-Fave and Scott, Substantive Criminal Law § 7.11(a) (1986). Generally, the effect of making out an imperfect self-defense claim is that a first-degree murder charge is reduced to manslaughter.”
Minnesota Pub. Interest Rsch. Grp. v. Adams, 482 F. Supp. 170 (D. Minnesota 1979). “As a different standard of review as to the agencies’ substantive decision to proceed is operative under plaintiffs’ pendent claims, the Court’s analysis under NEPA is not necessarily controlling.”
HealthPartners, Inc. v. Am. Guarantee & Liab. Ins. Co. (D. Minnesota 2022). “§ 7.11.) The Policy includes Time Element coverage (i.”
— Minn. Stat. § 7.11(a) — 1 case
State v. Thompson, 544 N.W.2d 8 (Minn. 1996). “2 La-Fave and Scott, Substantive Criminal Law § 7.11(a) (1986). Generally, the effect of making out an imperfect self-defense claim is that a first-degree murder charge is reduced to manslaughter.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.