Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 79A.27 (2026)

Indemnity Agreement Form

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

INDIVIDUAL AND PROPORTIONATE INDEMNITY AGREEMENT

WHEREAS, (name of company) has agreed to be and has been accepted as a member of (name of commercial self-insurance group).

WHEREAS, (name of company) has agreed to be bound by all of the provisions of the Minnesota Workers' Compensation Act and all rules promulgated thereunder.

WHEREAS, that (name of company) has agreed to be bound by bylaws or plan of operation and all amendments thereto of (name of commercial self-insurance group);

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED that:

1. (Name of company) shall be jointly and severally liable for all claims and expenses of all the members of (name of commercial self-insurance group) arising in any fund year in which (name of company) is a member of the commercial self-insurance group.

2. (Name of commercial self-insurance group) shall assess (name of company) on an individual and proportionate basis for its share of the total liability of the commercial self-insurance group.

3. In the event that (name of company) is not a member for the full year, it shall be only liable for a pro rata share of that liability.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the (name of company) and (name of commercial self-insurance group) have caused this indemnity agreement to be executed by its authorized officers:

Commercial Self-Insurance Group Name		Company Name
By: .		By: .
date: .		date: .

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2011–2011 · leading case: EEP Workers' Comp. Fund v. Fun & Sun, Inc., 794 N.W.2d 126 (Minn. Ct. App. 2011).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

EEP Workers' Comp. Fund v. Fun & Sun, Inc., 794 N.W.2d 126 (Minn. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 5× “However, there is also a similar indemnification form set forth in Minn.Stat. § 79A.27, which does include language clearly expressing the indemnity obligation.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.