Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 9. EXECUTIVE COUNCIL
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 9.01 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1953 c 492 s 8]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1974–2019 · leading case: OmegaGenesis Corp. v. Mayo Found. for Med. Educ. & Rsch., 132 F. Supp. 3d 1119 (D. Minnesota 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
OmegaGenesis Corp. v. Mayo Found. for Med. Educ. & Rsch., 132 F. Supp. 3d 1119 (D. Minnesota 2015). · cites it 2× “§ 9.01(b). Related to this warranty and representation by OmegaGenesis, a specific disclaimer provides: EXCEPT AS EXPLICITLY SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT, THE KNOW-HOW, CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND PATENT RIGHTS ARE PROVIDED “AS IS,” “WITH ALL FAULTS,” AND “WITH ALL DEFECTS,” AND…”
Barker v. Ceridian Corp., 918 F. Supp. 1298 (D. Minnesota 1996). “Health Care Plan, Article IX, §§ 9.01 and 9.03, pg. 30-31, attached to the affidavit of Ann M.”
City of Bloomington v. Munson, 221 N.W.2d 787 (Minn. 1974). · cites it 2× “Easements including but not limited to slopes, fills, sewers, building lines, poles, wires, pipes and conduits for water, gas, heat and power may be acquired by gift, devise, purchase or condemnation in the manner provided by law.”
Nelson v. Advanced Signs, Inc. (D. Minnesota 2019). “IX § 9.01.) In order for the Funds to determine Advanced Sign’s monthly premium, Advanced Signs is required to disclose to the Funds on a monthly basis all employees performing work in classifications covered by the CBAs.”
— Minn. Stat. § 9.01(b) — 1 case
OmegaGenesis Corp. v. Mayo Found. for Med. Educ. & Rsch., 132 F. Supp. 3d 1119 (D. Minnesota 2015). “§ 9.01(b). Related to this warranty and representation by OmegaGenesis, a specific disclaimer provides: EXCEPT AS EXPLICITLY SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT, THE KNOW-HOW, CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND PATENT RIGHTS ARE PROVIDED “AS IS,” “WITH ALL FAULTS,” AND “WITH ALL DEFECTS,” AND…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.