Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 97.35 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1945 c 248 s 7]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1985–1997 · leading case: Potucek v. City of Warren, 535 N.W.2d 333 (Minn. 1995).
Potucek v. City of Warren, 535 N.W.2d 333 (Minn. 1995). “§ 424a; see 4 Larson, The Law of Workmen's Compensation, § 97.35(a) (1995).”
Lindell v. Oak Park Coop. Creamery, 369 N.W.2d 505 (Minn. 1985). “The constitutionality of benefit coordination provisions meant to eliminate duplication of wageloss benefits is well established.”
Ruter v. Minnesota Dep't of Corr., 569 N.W.2d 407 (Minn. 1997). “1985); see also 9 Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, §§ 97.35(b) and 97.41(f), and is not uncommon in private pension plans, see Larson’s, § 97.”
— Minn. Stat. § 97.35(a) — 1 case
Potucek v. City of Warren, 535 N.W.2d 333 (Minn. 1995). “§ 424a; see 4 Larson, The Law of Workmen's Compensation, § 97.35(a) (1995).”
— Minn. Stat. § 97.35(b) — 2 cases
Lindell v. Oak Park Coop. Creamery, 369 N.W.2d 505 (Minn. 1985). “The constitutionality of benefit coordination provisions meant to eliminate duplication of wageloss benefits is well established.”
Ruter v. Minnesota Dep't of Corr., 569 N.W.2d 407 (Minn. 1997). “1985); see also 9 Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, §§ 97.35(b) and 97.41(f), and is not uncommon in private pension plans, see Larson’s, § 97.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.