Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 97.51 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1986 c 386 art 4 s 33]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1997–1997 · leading case: Ruter v. Minnesota Dep't of Corr., 569 N.W.2d 407 (Minn. 1997).
Ruter v. Minnesota Dep't of Corr., 569 N.W.2d 407 (Minn. 1997). “41(f), and is not uncommon in private pension plans, see Larson’s, § 97.51(c). As for employee’s remaining claims we have carefully considered these issues and find they are without merit.”
— Minn. Stat. § 97.51(c) — 1 case
Ruter v. Minnesota Dep't of Corr., 569 N.W.2d 407 (Minn. 1997). “41(f), and is not uncommon in private pension plans, see Larson’s, § 97.51(c). As for employee’s remaining claims we have carefully considered these issues and find they are without merit.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.