Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 1-3-4 (2026)

Capital case, capital offense, capital crime, and capital murder

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The terms "capital case," "capital cases," "capital offense," "capital offenses," and "capital crime" when used in any statute shall denote criminal cases, offenses and crimes punishable by death or imprisonment for life in the state penitentiary. The term "capital murder" when used in any statute shall denote criminal cases, offenses and crimes punishable by death, or imprisonment for life in the state penitentiary.

Laws, 1974, ch. 576, § 1; Laws, 1977, ch. 458, § 6, eff. 4/13/1977.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 48 cases, 1976–2019 · leading case: Ex Parte Dennis, 334 So. 2d 369 (Miss. 1976).
Ex Parte Dennis, 334 So. 2d 369 (Miss. 1976). · cites it 17× “The habeas corpus petition was dismissed on the basis of Mississippi Code Annotated section 1-3-4 (Supp. 1975) hereinafter set forth.”
Bennett v. State, 933 So. 2d 930 (Miss. 2006). · cites it 4× “Mississippi Code Annotated Section 1-3-4 states; "[t]he term `capital murder' when used in any statute shall denote criminal cases, offenses and crimes punishable by death, or imprisonment for life in the state penitentiary.”
Havard v. State, 928 So. 2d 771 (Miss. 2006). · cites it 2× “Miss.Code Ann. § 1-3-4. This issue is without merit.”
Tapper v. State, 47 So. 3d 95 (Miss. 2010). · cites it 4× “Therefore, based on the sexual-battery counts, Tapper was on trial for the alleged commission of capital offenses, as defined by Mississippi Code Section 1-3-4 (Rev. 2005). Thus, Tapper was entitled to twelve peremptory challenges.”
Branch v. State, 882 So. 2d 36 (Miss. 2004). · cites it 2× “Therefore, Apprendi is inapplicable because unlike Arizona's statutory scheme that required a finding of an aggravating circumstance to make a defendant death eligible, Mississippi's law defines that convictions of certain crimes render the defendant death eligible.”
Edmonds v. State, 955 So. 2d 787 (Miss. 2007). · cites it 2× “§ 1-3-4 in light of the Mississippi Constitution, reasoning that, while the legislature could define "capital" by statute as carrying the penalty of death or life imprisonment, this statutory definition did not change the meaning of the word as it was used in § 29 of the State…”
Hodges v. State, 912 So. 2d 730 (Miss. 2005). · cites it 2× “Under Miss.Code Ann. § 1-3-4 (Rev.1998), the maximum punishment of a person convicted of capital murder is death.”
Glasper v. State, 914 So. 2d 708 (Miss. 2005). · cites it 2× “Miss.Code Ann. § 1-3-4 (Rev.2005). Glasper's case was tried as a death penalty case; however, since the jury could not unanimously agree on the punishment upon his conviction of capital murder, the trial judge sentenced Glasper to a term of life imprisonment as required by…”
Leatherwood v. State, 548 So. 2d 389 (Miss. 1989). · cites it 2× “1985) Miss. Code Ann. § 1-3-4 (Supp. 1988) provides: *403 The terms "capital case," "capital cases," "capital offense," "capital offenses," and "capital crime" when used in any statute shall denote criminal cases, offenses and crimes punishable by death or imprisonment for life…”
Baker v. State, 930 So. 2d 399 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 4× “The detective had told Baker that his brother was implicating him in the sexual abuse; it is hard to understand why Baker would confess to sexual abuse of a child so as to benefit his brother while his brother was, allegedly, implicating him, or moreover, how the admission would…”
Taggart v. State, 957 So. 2d 981 (Miss. 2007). · cites it 2× “[5] For kidnapping, the sentencing judge has the authority to impose a penitentiary sentence of not less than one year, nor more than thirty years; for rape under section 97-3-65(4)(a), the sentencing judge has the authority to impose a penitentiary sentence "for any term as the…”
Campbell v. State, 749 So. 2d 1208 (Miss. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 14× “Miss.Code Ann. § 1-3-4 (emphasis added). ¶ 10.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.