Mississippi Code
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9 (2026)
Exemption of governmental entity from liability on claims based on specified circumstances
✓ current as of July 2026
- (1) A governmental entity and its employees acting within the course and scope of their employment or duties shall not be liable for any claim:
- (a) Arising out of a legislative or judicial action or inaction, or administrative action or inaction of a legislative or judicial nature;
- (b) Arising out of any act or omission of an employee of a governmental entity exercising ordinary care in reliance upon, or in the execution or performance of, or in the failure to execute or perform, a statute, ordinance or regulation, whether or not the statute, ordinance or regulation be valid;
- (c) Arising out of any act or omission of an employee of a governmental entity engaged in the performance or execution of duties or activities relating to police or fire protection unless the employee acted in reckless disregard of the safety and well-being of any person not engaged in criminal activity at the time of injury;
- (d) Based upon the exercise or performance or the failure to exercise or perform a discretionary function or duty on the part of a governmental entity or employee thereof, whether or not the discretion be abused;
- (e) Arising out of an injury caused by adopting or failing to adopt a statute, ordinance or regulation;
- (f) Which is limited or barred by the provisions of any other law;
- (g) Arising out of the exercise of discretion in determining whether or not to seek or provide the resources necessary for the purchase of equipment, the construction or maintenance of facilities, the hiring of personnel and, in general, the provision of adequate governmental services;
- (h) Arising out of the issuance, denial, suspension or revocation of, or the failure or refusal to issue, deny, suspend or revoke any privilege, ticket, pass, permit, license, certificate, approval, order or similar authorization where the governmental entity or its employee is authorized by law to determine whether or not such authorization should be issued, denied, suspended or revoked unless such issuance, denial, suspension or revocation, or failure or refusal thereof, is of a malicious or arbitrary and capricious nature;
- (i) Arising out of the assessment or collection of any tax or fee;
- (j) Arising out of the detention of any goods or merchandise by any law enforcement officer, unless such detention is of a malicious or arbitrary and capricious nature;
- (k) Arising out of the imposition or establishment of a quarantine, whether such quarantine relates to persons or property;
- (l) Of any claimant who is an employee of a governmental entity and whose injury is covered by the Workers' Compensation Law of this state by benefits furnished by the governmental entity by which he is employed;
- (m) Of any claimant who at the time the claim arises is an inmate of any detention center, jail, workhouse, penal farm, penitentiary or other such institution, regardless of whether such claimant is or is not an inmate of any detention center, jail, workhouse, penal farm, penitentiary or other such institution when the claim is filed;
- (n) Arising out of any work performed by a person convicted of a crime when the work is performed pursuant to any sentence or order of any court or pursuant to laws of the State of Mississippi authorizing or requiring such work;
- (o) Under circumstances where liability has been or is hereafter assumed by the United States, to the extent of such assumption of liability, including, but not limited to, any claim based on activities of the Mississippi National Guard when such claim is cognizable under the National Guard Tort Claims Act of the United States, 32 USCS 715, or when such claim accrues as a result of active federal service or state service at the call of the Governor for quelling riots and civil disturbances;
- (p) Arising out of a plan or design for construction or improvements to public property, including, but not limited to, public buildings, highways, roads, streets, bridges, levees, dikes, dams, impoundments, drainage channels, diversion channels, harbors, ports, wharfs or docks, where such plan or design has been approved in advance of the construction or improvement by the legislative body or governing authority of a governmental entity or by some other body or administrative agency, exercising discretion by authority to give such approval, and where such plan or design is in conformity with engineering or design standards in effect at the time of preparation of the plan or design;
- (q) Arising out of an injury caused solely by the effect of weather conditions on the use of streets and highways;
- (r) Arising out of the lack of adequate personnel or facilities at a state hospital or state corrections facility if reasonable use of available appropriations has been made to provide such personnel or facilities;
- (s) Arising out of loss, damage or destruction of property of a patient or inmate of a state institution;
- (t) Arising out of any loss of benefits or compensation due under a program of public assistance or public welfare;
- (u) Arising out of or resulting from riots, unlawful assemblies, unlawful public demonstrations, mob violence or civil disturbances;
- (v) Arising out of an injury caused by a dangerous condition on property of the governmental entity that was not caused by the negligent or other wrongful conduct of an employee of the governmental entity or of which the governmental entity did not have notice, either actual or constructive, and adequate opportunity to protect or warn against; provided, however, that a governmental entity shall not be liable for the failure to warn of a dangerous condition which is obvious to one exercising due care;
- (w) Arising out of the absence, condition, malfunction or removal by third parties of any sign, signal, warning device, illumination device, guardrail or median barrier, unless the absence, condition, malfunction or removal is not corrected by the governmental entity responsible for its maintenance within a reasonable time after actual or constructive notice;
- (x) Arising out of the administration of corporal punishment or the taking of any action to maintain control and discipline of students, as defined in Section 37-11-57, by a teacher, assistant teacher, principal or assistant principal of a public school district in the state unless the teacher, assistant teacher, principal or assistant principal acted in bad faith or with malicious purpose or in a manner exhibiting a wanton and willful disregard of human rights or safety; or
- (y) Arising out of the construction, maintenance or operation of any highway, bridge or roadway project entered into by the Mississippi Transportation Commission or other governmental entity and a company under the provisions of Section 65-43-1 or 65-43-3, where the act or omission occurs during the term of any such contract.
- (2) A governmental entity shall also not be liable for any claim where the governmental entity:
- (a) Is inactive and dormant;
- (b) Receives no revenue;
- (c) Has no employees; and
- (d) Owns no property.
- (3) If a governmental entity exempt from liability by subsection (2) becomes active, receives income, hires employees or acquires any property, such governmental entity shall no longer be exempt from liability as provided in subsection (2) and shall be subject to the provisions of this chapter.
Laws, 1984, ch. 495, § 6; reenacted without change, 1985, ch. 474, § 5; Laws, 1987, ch. 483, § 5; Laws, 1993, ch. 476, § 4; Laws, 1994, ch. 334, § 1; Laws, 1995, ch. 483, § 1; Laws, 1996, ch. 538, § 1; Laws, 1997, ch. 512, § 2; Laws, 2007, ch. 582, § 21, eff. 7/18/2007 (the date the United States Attorney General interposed no objection under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, to the amendment of this section).
Brought forward by Laws, 2016, ch. 367, HB 1119, 3, eff. 7/1/2016.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 522
cases (108 in the last 5 years), 1985–2026 · leading case: Samuel Wilcher, Jr. v. Lincoln Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors, 243 So. 3d 177 (Miss. 2018).
Samuel Wilcher, Jr. v. Lincoln Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors, 243 So. 3d 177 (Miss. 2018). “See Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9 (1)(d) (Rev. 2012).”
Covington Cnty. Sch. Dist. v. Magee, 29 So. 3d 1 (Miss. 2010). “Miss.Code Ann. § 11-46-9 (Rev.2002). Mississippi Code Annotated Section 11-46-9 states, in pertinent part: (1) A governmental entity and its employees acting within the course and scope of their employment or duties shall not be liable for any claim: .”
Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. Leake Cnty. Sch. Dist., 195 So. 3d 771 (Miss. 2016). “See Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9 (1)(d) (Rev. 2012).”
Lang v. Bay St. Louis/Waveland Sch. Dist., 764 So. 2d 1234 (Miss. 1999). “Miss.Code Ann. 11-46-9 (Supp.1998). Consequently, if this Court finds the school district's acts or omissions fall under the subsections of § 11-46-9, then the school district would be exempt from liability.”
Collins v. Tallahatchie Cnty., 876 So. 2d 284 (Miss. 2004). “The trial court, citing Miss.Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(a), [8] also noted that immunity is to be granted for claims arising out of judicial actions and inactions as well as administrative actions or inactions which are of a judicial nature.”
LW v. McComb Separate Mun. Sch. Dist., 754 So. 2d 1136 (Miss. 1999). “Miss.Code Ann. § 11-46-9 (Supp.1998). ¶ 13.”
Willing v. Est. of Benz, 958 So. 2d 1240 (Miss. Ct. App. 2007). “Code Section 11-46-9"); Pearl River Valley Water Supply Dist.”
Wallace v. Town of Raleigh, 815 So. 2d 1203 (Miss. 2002). “The statute at issue is Miss.Code Ann. § 11-46-9 (Supp.2001) which states in part as follows: (1) A governmental entity and its employees acting within the course and scope of their employment or duties shall not be liable for any claim: .”
Little v. Mississippi Dep't of Transp., 129 So. 3d 132 (Miss. 2013). “Little asserts that the Court of Appeals erred in applying the immunity provisions of the MTCA found in Section 11-46-9. He also asserts that the courts’ longstanding and consistent application of those immunity provisions is erroneous and should be overturned because, in his…”
City of Jackson v. Powell, 917 So. 2d 59 (Miss. 2005). “The city also argues that it is immune from liability under § 11-46-9(1)(c) because the trial judge failed to make a finding that the officers acted in "reckless disregard" of Powell's safety and well-being at the time of his injury.”
Fanny Hudson v. City of Yazoo City, Mississippi, 246 So. 3d 872 (Miss. 2018). “Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9 (1)(d) and (v) (Rev.”
Harris Ex Rel. Harris v. McCray, 867 So. 2d 188 (Miss. 2003). “Since Coach McCray's actions and duties in coaching his football team were clearly discretionary, then, under Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9 (1)(d), our inquiry ends without any discussion about whether Coach McCray exercised ordinary care and without any imposition of potential…”
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1): 72 cases
Samuel Wilcher, Jr. v. Lincoln Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors, 243 So. 3d 177 (Miss. 2018). “See Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9 (1)(d) (Rev. 2012).”
Little v. Mississippi Dep't of Transp., 129 So. 3d 132 (Miss. 2013). “Little asserts that the Court of Appeals erred in applying the immunity provisions of the MTCA found in Section 11-46-9. He also asserts that the courts’ longstanding and consistent application of those immunity provisions is erroneous and should be overturned because, in his…”
Leslie v. City of Biloxi, 758 So. 2d 430 (Miss. 2000).
Maxwell v. Jackson Cnty., 768 So. 2d 900 (Miss. 2000).
Simpson Cnty. v. McElroy, 82 So. 3d 621 (Miss. Ct. App. 2011).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(1): 2 cases
Cotton v. Paschall, 782 So. 2d 1215 (Miss. 2001).
Gregory Cotton v. Barbara Paschall (Miss. 1999).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(M): 2 cases
Webb v. DeSoto Cnty., 843 So. 2d 682 (Miss. 2003).
Donna Webb v. Desoto Cnty. (Miss. 2001).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(a): 14 cases
Collins v. Tallahatchie Cnty., 876 So. 2d 284 (Miss. 2004). “The trial court, citing Miss.Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(a), [8] also noted that immunity is to be granted for claims arising out of judicial actions and inactions as well as administrative actions or inactions which are of a judicial nature.”
DeSoto Cnty., Mississippi v. Tracy Dennis, 160 So. 3d 1154 (Miss. 2015).
LW v. McComb Separate Mun. Sch. Dist., 754 So. 2d 1136 (Miss. 1999). “Miss.Code Ann. § 11-46-9 (Supp.1998). ¶ 13.”
Blake v. Wilson, 962 So. 2d 705 (Miss. Ct. App. 2007).
Kmart Corp. v. Kroger Co., 963 F. Supp. 2d 605 (N.D. Miss. 2013).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(a)(b)(e): 1 case
Madison v. Desoto Cnty., 822 So. 2d 306 (Miss. Ct. App. 2002).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(a)(x): 1 case
Cotton v. Paschall, 782 So. 2d 1215 (Miss. 2001).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(b): 31 cases
Covington Cnty. Sch. Dist. v. Magee, 29 So. 3d 1 (Miss. 2010). “Miss.Code Ann. § 11-46-9 (Rev.2002). Mississippi Code Annotated Section 11-46-9 states, in pertinent part: (1) A governmental entity and its employees acting within the course and scope of their employment or duties shall not be liable for any claim: .”
Lang v. Bay St. Louis/Waveland Sch. Dist., 764 So. 2d 1234 (Miss. 1999). “Miss.Code Ann. 11-46-9 (Supp.1998). Consequently, if this Court finds the school district's acts or omissions fall under the subsections of § 11-46-9, then the school district would be exempt from liability.”
Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. Leake Cnty. Sch. Dist., 195 So. 3d 771 (Miss. 2016). “See Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9 (1)(d) (Rev. 2012).”
Harris Ex Rel. Harris v. McCray, 867 So. 2d 188 (Miss. 2003). “Since Coach McCray's actions and duties in coaching his football team were clearly discretionary, then, under Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9 (1)(d), our inquiry ends without any discussion about whether Coach McCray exercised ordinary care and without any imposition of potential…”
City of Belmont v. Miss. State Tax Comm'n, 860 So. 2d 289 (Miss. 2003).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(b)(c)(d): 1 case
Bridges v. Pearl River Valley Water Supply Dist., 793 So. 2d 584 (Miss. 2001).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(c): 111 cases
City of Jackson v. Powell, 917 So. 2d 59 (Miss. 2005). “The city also argues that it is immune from liability under § 11-46-9(1)(c) because the trial judge failed to make a finding that the officers acted in "reckless disregard" of Powell's safety and well-being at the time of his injury.”
Johnson v. City of Cleveland, 846 So. 2d 1031 (Miss. 2003).
City of Laurel v. Williams Ex Rel. Williams, 21 So. 3d 1170 (Miss. 2009).
Willing v. Est. of Benz, 958 So. 2d 1240 (Miss. Ct. App. 2007). “Code Section 11-46-9"); Pearl River Valley Water Supply Dist.”
Turner v. City of Ruleville, 735 So. 2d 226 (Miss. 1999).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(d): 109 cases
Samuel Wilcher, Jr. v. Lincoln Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors, 243 So. 3d 177 (Miss. 2018). “See Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9 (1)(d) (Rev. 2012).”
Covington Cnty. Sch. Dist. v. Magee, 29 So. 3d 1 (Miss. 2010). “Miss.Code Ann. § 11-46-9 (Rev.2002). Mississippi Code Annotated Section 11-46-9 states, in pertinent part: (1) A governmental entity and its employees acting within the course and scope of their employment or duties shall not be liable for any claim: .”
Fanny Hudson v. City of Yazoo City, Mississippi, 246 So. 3d 872 (Miss. 2018). “Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9 (1)(d) and (v) (Rev.”
Collins v. Tallahatchie Cnty., 876 So. 2d 284 (Miss. 2004). “The trial court, citing Miss.Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(a), [8] also noted that immunity is to be granted for claims arising out of judicial actions and inactions as well as administrative actions or inactions which are of a judicial nature.”
Lang v. Bay St. Louis/Waveland Sch. Dist., 764 So. 2d 1234 (Miss. 1999). “Miss.Code Ann. 11-46-9 (Supp.1998). Consequently, if this Court finds the school district's acts or omissions fall under the subsections of § 11-46-9, then the school district would be exempt from liability.”
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(d)(g)(v): 1 case
Dotts v. Pat Harrison Waterway Dist., 933 So. 2d 322 (Miss. Ct. App. 2006).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(d)(p): 1 case
O. R. Garretson v. Mississippi Dep't of Transp., 156 So. 3d 241 (Miss. 2014).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(e): 2 cases
A.B. Ex Rel. C.D. v. Stone Cnty. Sch. Dist., 14 So. 3d 794 (Miss. Ct. App. 2009).
Leflore Cnty., Mississippi v. Bob Givens (Miss. 1998).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(f): 1 case
Parsons v. Miss. State Port Auth. at Gulfport, 996 So. 2d 165 (Miss. Ct. App. 2008).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(g): 7 cases
Lang v. Bay St. Louis/Waveland Sch. Dist., 764 So. 2d 1234 (Miss. 1999). “Miss.Code Ann. 11-46-9 (Supp.1998). Consequently, if this Court finds the school district's acts or omissions fall under the subsections of § 11-46-9, then the school district would be exempt from liability.”
Brewer v. Burdette, 768 So. 2d 920 (Miss. 2000).
Sheila Lang v. Bay St. Louis/Waveland Sch. Dist. (Miss. 1997).
Jeremy D. Brewer v. Anna L. Burdette (Miss. 1997).
Jimmie Nell Long v. Jones Cnty., Mississippi by & through The Bd. of Supervisors (Miss. Ct. App. 2020).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(h): 7 cases
Lowe v. Lowndes Cnty. Bldg. Insp. Dept., 760 So. 2d 711 (Miss. 2000).
Turner v. City of Ruleville, 735 So. 2d 226 (Miss. 1999).
Edward Springer v. Ausbern Constr. Co., Inc., 231 So. 3d 1065 (Miss. Ct. App. 2016).
City of Tupelo, Mississippi v. Terry Y. McMillin, 192 So. 3d 948 (Miss. 2016).
Kmart Corp. v. Kroger Co., 963 F. Supp. 2d 605 (N.D. Miss. 2013).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(i): 2 cases
1704 21ST AVENUE, LTD. v. City of Gulfport, 988 So. 2d 412 (Miss. Ct. App. 2008).
Booneville Collision Repair, Inc. v. City of Booneville, Mississippi, 152 So. 3d 265 (Miss. 2014).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(l): 3 cases
Roy Leslie v. City of Biloxi, Mississippi (Miss. 1998).
Mary Maxwell v. Jackson Cnty., Mississippi (Miss. 1999).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(m): 37 cases
Wallace v. Town of Raleigh, 815 So. 2d 1203 (Miss. 2002). “The statute at issue is Miss.Code Ann. § 11-46-9 (Supp.2001) which states in part as follows: (1) A governmental entity and its employees acting within the course and scope of their employment or duties shall not be liable for any claim: .”
Lee v. Thompson, 859 So. 2d 981 (Miss. 2003).
Hinds Cnty., Mississippi v. Ronnie Burton, 187 So. 3d 1016 (Miss. 2016).
Webb v. DeSoto Cnty., 843 So. 2d 682 (Miss. 2003).
Carter v. Mississippi Dept. of Corr., 860 So. 2d 1187 (Miss. 2003).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(n): 3 cases
Wallace v. Town of Raleigh, 815 So. 2d 1203 (Miss. 2002). “The statute at issue is Miss.Code Ann. § 11-46-9 (Supp.2001) which states in part as follows: (1) A governmental entity and its employees acting within the course and scope of their employment or duties shall not be liable for any claim: .”
Hord v. City of Yazoo City, 702 So. 2d 121 (Miss. 1997).
Roger Wallace v. Town of Raleigh, Mississippi (Miss. 2001).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(p): 5 cases
Mississippi Transp. Comm'n v. Dominique Adams, D, 197 So. 3d 406 (Miss. 2016).
Chisolm v. Mississippi Dept. of Transp., 942 So. 2d 136 (Miss. 2006).
Chisolm v. Mississippi Dept. of Transp., 942 So. 2d 165 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005).
W. Sur. Co. v. Cook Coggin Engineers, Inc.; Kyle Strong, P.E.; & M. Carrson Neal, P.E. (N.D. Miss. 2026).
Leflore Cnty., Mississippi v. Bob Givens (Miss. 1998).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(q): 12 cases
Kenneth L. Ostrowski, Jr. v. City of D'Iberville, Mississippi, 269 So. 3d 418 (Miss. Ct. App. 2018).
Willing v. Est. of Benz, 958 So. 2d 1240 (Miss. Ct. App. 2007). “Code Section 11-46-9"); Pearl River Valley Water Supply Dist.”
Mississippi Dept. of Transp. v. Cargile, 847 So. 2d 258 (Miss. 2003).
Fairley v. George Cnty., 871 So. 2d 713 (Miss. 2004).
Schepens v. City of Long Beach, 924 So. 2d 620 (Miss. Ct. App. 2006).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(u): 1 case
Chapman v. City of Quitman, 954 So. 2d 468 (Miss. Ct. App. 2007).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(v): 44 cases
City of Clinton v. Smith, 861 So. 2d 323 (Miss. 2003).
Samuel Wilcher, Jr. v. Lincoln Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors, 243 So. 3d 177 (Miss. 2018). “See Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9 (1)(d) (Rev. 2012).”
JohnTate Campbell v. Harrison Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors, 269 So. 3d 1269 (Miss. Ct. App. 2018).
Mississippi Dept. of Transp. v. Trosclair, 851 So. 2d 408 (Miss. Ct. App. 2003).
Howard v. City of Biloxi, 943 So. 2d 751 (Miss. Ct. App. 2006).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(v)(w): 1 case
Chisolm v. Mississippi Dept. of Transp., 942 So. 2d 165 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(w): 9 cases
Mitchell v. City of Greenville, 846 So. 2d 1028 (Miss. 2003).
Jones v. Mississippi Dept. of Transp., 744 So. 2d 256 (Miss. 1999).
Mississippi Dept. of Transp. v. Trosclair, 851 So. 2d 408 (Miss. Ct. App. 2003).
Willing v. Est. of Benz, 958 So. 2d 1240 (Miss. Ct. App. 2007). “Code Section 11-46-9"); Pearl River Valley Water Supply Dist.”
Willingham v. Mississippi Transp. Com'n, 944 So. 2d 949 (Miss. Ct. App. 2006).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(x): 6 cases
Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. Leake Cnty. Sch. Dist., 195 So. 3d 771 (Miss. 2016). “See Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9 (1)(d) (Rev. 2012).”
Pigford v. Jackson Pub. Sch. Dist., 910 So. 2d 575 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005).
Cotton v. Paschall, 782 So. 2d 1215 (Miss. 2001).
Sharon Moore, Parent & Next Friend of Minor Child, A.T. v. Jackson Pub. Sch. Sys. (Miss. Ct. App. 2023).
Moss Point Sch. Dist. v. Zachariah Zai Stennis (Miss. 2011).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(2): 2 cases
Lee v. Thompson, 859 So. 2d 981 (Miss. 2003).
Susan Renee Lee v. Andrew Thompson (Miss. 2001).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(a)(b): 1 case
Mississippi Dept. of Wildlife v. Brannon, 943 So. 2d 53 (Miss. Ct. App. 2006).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(b): 3 cases
Lippincott v. Miss. Bureau of Narcotics, 856 So. 2d 465 (Miss. Ct. App. 2003).
Ladner v. Stone Cnty., 938 So. 2d 270 (Miss. Ct. App. 2006).
Evans v. Mississippi Dep't of Human Servs., 36 So. 3d 463 (Miss. Ct. App. 2010).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(c): 13 cases
Lippincott v. Miss. Bureau of Narcotics, 856 So. 2d 465 (Miss. Ct. App. 2003).
Simpson v. City of Pickens, 761 So. 2d 855 (Miss. 2000).
Morgan v. City of Ruleville, 627 So. 2d 275 (Miss. 1993).
Grantham v. Dept. of Corr., 522 So. 2d 219 (Miss. 1988).
Collins v. Tallahatchie Cnty., 876 So. 2d 284 (Miss. 2004). “The trial court, citing Miss.Code Ann. § 11-46-9(1)(a), [8] also noted that immunity is to be granted for claims arising out of judicial actions and inactions as well as administrative actions or inactions which are of a judicial nature.”
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(c)(d): 1 case
Tie-reace Hollingsworth v. City of Laurel, 808 So. 2d 950 (Miss. 2002).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(d): 13 cases
Taghi 'Ted' Boroujerdi v. City of Starkville, 158 So. 3d 1106 (Miss. 2015).
Jones v. Mississippi Dept. of Transp., 744 So. 2d 256 (Miss. 1999).
LW v. McComb Separate Mun. Sch. Dist., 754 So. 2d 1136 (Miss. 1999). “Miss.Code Ann. § 11-46-9 (Supp.1998). ¶ 13.”
Doe v. State Ex Rel. Mississippi Dept. of Corr., 859 So. 2d 350 (Miss. 2003).
City of Jackson v. Doe Ex Rel. J.J., 68 So. 3d 1285 (Miss. 2011).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(d)(1): 2 cases
Bobbie Jean Lowe v. City of Moss Point, Mississippi, a Mun. Corp., 243 So. 3d 753 (Miss. Ct. App. 2017).
Mississippi Dep't of Human Servs. v. D.C. (Miss. 2019).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(d)(1972): 1 case
Ladner v. Stone Cnty., 938 So. 2d 270 (Miss. Ct. App. 2006).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(d)(p): 1 case
O. R. Garretson v. Mississippi Dep't of Transp., 156 So. 3d 241 (Miss. 2014).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(h): 1 case
Dunston v. Mississippi Dept. of Marine Res., 892 So. 2d 837 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(i)(h): 1 case
Lowe v. Lowndes Cnty. Bldg. Insp. Dept., 760 So. 2d 711 (Miss. 2000).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(l)(a): 2 cases
DeSoto Cnty., Mississippi v. Tracy Dennis, 160 So. 3d 1154 (Miss. 2015).
Newton Cnty. v. State ex rel. Dukes, 133 So. 3d 819 (Miss. Ct. App. 2013).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(l)(b): 3 cases
Simpson Cnty. v. McElroy, 82 So. 3d 621 (Miss. Ct. App. 2011).
A.B. Ex Rel. C.D. v. Stone Cnty. Sch. Dist., 14 So. 3d 794 (Miss. Ct. App. 2009).
J.S. v. Lamar Cnty. Sch. Dist., 94 So. 3d 1247 (Miss. Ct. App. 2012).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(l)(c): 7 cases
City of Laurel v. Williams Ex Rel. Williams, 21 So. 3d 1170 (Miss. 2009).
Tory v. City of Edwards, 829 So. 2d 1246 (Miss. Ct. App. 2002).
Est. of Carr Ex Rel. Macfield v. City of Ruleville, 5 So. 3d 455 (Miss. Ct. App. 2008).
Bradley A. McElroy, Sr. v. City of Brandon, Mississippi, 198 So. 3d 373 (Miss. Ct. App. 2015).
City of Jackson v. Lewis, 153 So. 3d 714 (Miss. Ct. App. 2013).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(l)(d): 28 cases
Mississippi Transp. Comm'n v. Montgomery, 80 So. 3d 789 (Miss. 2012).
Knight v. Mississippi Transp. Comm'n, 10 So. 3d 962 (Miss. Ct. App. 2009).
Cynthia Renee Crider v. DeSoto Cnty. Convention & Visitors Bureau, 201 So. 3d 1063 (Miss. 2016).
Simpson Cnty. v. McElroy, 82 So. 3d 621 (Miss. Ct. App. 2011).
Little v. Mississippi Dep't of Transp., 129 So. 3d 132 (Miss. 2013). “Little asserts that the Court of Appeals erred in applying the immunity provisions of the MTCA found in Section 11-46-9. He also asserts that the courts’ longstanding and consistent application of those immunity provisions is erroneous and should be overturned because, in his…”
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(l)(e): 2 cases
Johnson v. City of Quitman, 66 So. 3d 1261 (Miss. Ct. App. 2011).
William T. Brantley v. City of Horn Lake, Mississippi, 152 So. 3d 1106 (Miss. 2014).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(l)(g): 1 case
Bell v. Mississippi Dep't of Human Servs., 126 So. 3d 999 (Miss. Ct. App. 2013).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(l)(m): 7 cases
Hinds Cnty., Mississippi v. Ronnie Burton, 187 So. 3d 1016 (Miss. 2016).
Leavitt v. Carter, 178 So. 3d 334 (Miss. Ct. App. 2012).
Tillman v. Mississippi Dep't of Corr., 95 So. 3d 716 (Miss. Ct. App. 2012).
Eason v. Frye, 972 F. Supp. 2d 935 (S.D. Miss. 2013).
Powell v. Clay Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors, 924 So. 2d 523 (Miss. 2006).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(l)(p): 1 case
MacDonald ex rel. MacDonald v. Mississippi Dep't of Transp., 955 So. 2d 355 (Miss. Ct. App. 2006).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(l)(v): 8 cases
Lee v. Mississippi Dep't of Transp., 37 So. 3d 73 (Miss. Ct. App. 2009).
Bryant v. Bd. of Supervisors of Rankin Cty., 10 So. 3d 919 (Miss. Ct. App. 2008).
Kaigler Ex Rel. Kaigler v. City of Bay St. Louis, 12 So. 3d 577 (Miss. Ct. App. 2009).
Virginia W. Case v. Bd. of Supervisors of Lauderdale Cnty., 164 So. 3d 1043 (Miss. Ct. App. 2014).
Hawkins v. City of Morton, 119 So. 3d 1104 (Miss. Ct. App. 2013).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(l)(w): 1 case
Dozier v. Hinds Cnty., 379 F. Supp. 2d 834 (S.D. Miss. 2005).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(m): 4 cases
Sparks v. Kim, 701 So. 2d 1113 (Miss. 1997).
Harvison v. Greene Cnty. Sheriff Dept., 899 So. 2d 922 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005).
Jones v. Baptist Mem'l Hosp.-golden, 735 So. 2d 993 (Miss. 1999).
Pat Sparks v. Myung Kim (Miss. 1994).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(p)(v): 3 cases
Chisolm v. Mississippi Dept. of Transp., 942 So. 2d 136 (Miss. 2006).
Chisolm v. Mississippi Dept. of Transp., 942 So. 2d 165 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005).
Linda Pugh v. Mississippi Dep't of Transp. (Miss. 2003).
Miss. Code Ann. § 11-46-9(v): 7 cases
City of Jackson v. Doe Ex Rel. J.J., 68 So. 3d 1285 (Miss. 2011).
Ladner v. Stone Cnty., 938 So. 2d 270 (Miss. Ct. App. 2006).
Dotts v. Pat Harrison Waterway Dist., 933 So. 2d 322 (Miss. Ct. App. 2006).
Jones v. Mississippi Transp. Com'n, 920 So. 2d 516 (Miss. Ct. App. 2006).
Mississippi Dept. of Wildlife v. Brannon, 943 So. 2d 53 (Miss. Ct. App. 2006).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.