Mississippi Code
Miss. Code Ann. § 13-5-23 (2026)
Exemptions; length of service of tales and grand jurors
✓ current as of July 2026
- (1) All qualified persons shall be liable to serve as jurors, unless excused by the court for one (1) of the following causes:
- (a) When the juror is ill and, on account of the illness, is incapable of performing jury service;
- (b) When the juror's attendance would cause undue or extreme physical or financial hardship to the prospective juror or a person under his or her care or supervision; or
- (c) When the potential juror is a breast-feeding mother.
- (2) An excuse of illness under subsection (1)(a) of this section may be made to the clerk of court outside of open court by providing the clerk with a certificate of a licensed physician, stating that the juror is ill and is unfit for jury service, in which case the clerk may excuse the juror. If the excuse of illness is not supported by a physician's certificate, a judge of the court for which the individual was called to jury service shall decide whether to excuse an individual under subsection (1)(a) of this section.
- (3)
- (a) The test of an excuse under subsection (1)(b) of this section for undue or extreme physical or financial hardship shall be whether the individual would either:
- (i) Be required to abandon a person under his or her personal care or supervision due to the impossibility of obtaining an appropriate substitute caregiver during the period of participation in the jury pool or on the jury; or
- (ii) Incur costs that would have a substantial adverse impact on the payment of the individual's necessary daily living expenses or on those for whom he or she provides the principal means of support; or
- (iii) Suffer physical hardship that would result in illness or disease.
- (b) "Undue or extreme physical or financial hardship" does not exist solely based on the fact that a prospective juror will be required to be absent from his or her place of employment or business.
- (c) A judge of the court for which the individual was called to jury service shall decide whether to excuse an individual under subsection (1)(b) of this section.
- (d) A person asking to be excused based on a finding of undue or extreme physical or financial hardship must take all actions necessary to have obtained a ruling on that request by no later than the date on which the individual is scheduled to appear for jury duty.
- (e) A person asking a judge to grant an excuse under subsection (1)(b) of this section may be required to provide the judge with documentation such as, but not limited to, federal and state income tax returns, medical statements from licensed physicians, proof of dependency or guardianship and similar documents, which the judge finds to clearly support the request to be excused. Failure to provide satisfactory documentation may result in a denial of the request to be excused.
- (f) In cases under subsection (1)(c) of this section, the excuse must be made by the juror in open court under oath.
- (a) The test of an excuse under subsection (1)(b) of this section for undue or extreme physical or financial hardship shall be whether the individual would either:
- (4) A person is excused from jury service permanently only when the deciding judge determines that the underlying grounds for being excused are of a permanent nature. A person who has been summoned for jury duty who meets the age threshold for exemption from jury service shall have the option to be permanently excused from jury service due to age by filing with the circuit clerk a notarized request to be permanently excused.
- (5) Grand jurors shall serve until discharged by the court.
Codes, Hutchinson's 1848, ch. 61, art. 10 (4); 1857, ch. 61, art. 127; 1871, § 735; 1880, § 1662; 1892, § 2356; 1906, § 2686; Hemingway's 1917, § 2178; 1930, § 2031; 1942, § 1764; Laws, 1938, ch. 302; Laws, 1944, ch. 197; Laws, 1976, ch. 464, § 1; Laws, 1988, ch. 438; Laws, 1990, ch. 360, § 1; Laws, 2004, 1st Ex Sess, ch. 1, § 8; Laws, 2006, ch. 437, § 1; Laws, 2006, ch. 520, § 10; Laws, 2007, ch. 433, § 1, eff. 1/1/2008.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1987–2021 · leading case: Davis v. State, 767 So. 2d 986 (Miss. 2000).
Davis v. State, 767 So. 2d 986 (Miss. 2000). “Miss.Code Ann. § 13-5-23 does permit dismissal, at the discretion of the trial court, of prospective jurors for serious illness or illness in the family, serious financial loss, and cases of emergency.”
Turner v. State, 573 So. 2d 657 (Miss. 1990). “Miss. Code Ann. § 13-5-23 (Supp. 1987). The assignment is rejected.”
Russell v. State, 670 So. 2d 816 (Miss. 1995). “Ultimately, 77 veniremembers were excused during these initial proceedings. Next, the trial judge sought to determine if any of the remaining veniremembers were not qualified to serve on Russell's jury, i.”
Gause v. State, 65 So. 3d 295 (Miss. 2011). “Miss.Code Ann. § 13-5-23 (Supp.2010). Mississippi Code Section 13-5-25 provides that certain jurors are exempt from jury service as a personal privilege.”
Moore v. State, 816 So. 2d 1022 (Miss. Ct. App. 2002). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 13-5-23 (Supp.2001). This argument is without merit.”
Pulliam v. State, 515 So. 2d 945 (Miss. 1987). “Because we are remanding the case for a new trial however, we address the assignment only to point out that non-compliance with Section 13-5-23, Mississippi Code Annotated (Supp.”
Page v. Siemens Energy & Automation, 728 So. 2d 1075 (Miss. 1998). “Miss.Code Ann. §§ 13-5-23 and 13-5-25 both provide for exemptions and privileges that may be claimed by Mississippians summoned for jury services.”
Trevillion v. State, 26 So. 3d 1098 (Miss. Ct. App. 2009). “Mississippi Code Annotated section 13-5-23 (Supp.2009) permits discretionary dismissal of jurors under certain conditions.”
Allen v. State, 945 So. 2d 422 (Miss. Ct. App. 2006). “2004) (oath of eminent domain jurors); and Miss Code Ann. § 13-5-23 (oath to truthfully answer court's questions concerning qualifications to serve as a juror).”
Hyundai Motor Am. & Hyundai Motor Co. v. Joyce D. Hutton & Derek Bell (Miss. 2021). “Miss. Code Ann. § 13-5-23 (1)(b), (3)(c) (Rev.”
Hyundai Motor Am. & Hyundai Motor Co. v. Ola Mae Applewhite, as Pers. Rep. of the Est. of & Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Dorothy Mae Applewhite, Ceola Wade, as Pers. Rep. of the Est. of & Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Anthony J. Stewart, & Kenneth Cordell Carter, as Pers. Rep. of the Est. of & Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Cecilia Cooper (Miss. 2021). “Miss. Code Ann. § 13-5-23 (1) (Rev. 2019).”
Ned O. Kronfol v. Barbara S. Johnson (Miss. Ct. App. 2019). “Kronfol also claims that the circuit clerk in this case further compounded the problem by failing to comply with Mississippi Code Annotated section 13-5-23 (Rev. 2012), which provides as follows: (1) All qualified persons shall be liable to serve as jurors, unless excused by the…”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 13-5-23(1) — 1 case
Hyundai Motor Am. & Hyundai Motor Co. v. Ola Mae Applewhite, as Pers. Rep. of the Est. of & Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Dorothy Mae Applewhite, Ceola Wade, as Pers. Rep. of the Est. of & Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Anthony J. Stewart, & Kenneth Cordell Carter, as Pers. Rep. of the Est. of & Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Cecilia Cooper (Miss. 2021). “Miss. Code Ann. § 13-5-23 (1) (Rev. 2019).”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 13-5-23(1)(b) — 2 cases
Hyundai Motor Am. & Hyundai Motor Co. v. Ola Mae Applewhite, as Pers. Rep. of the Est. of & Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Dorothy Mae Applewhite, Ceola Wade, as Pers. Rep. of the Est. of & Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Anthony J. Stewart, & Kenneth Cordell Carter, as Pers. Rep. of the Est. of & Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Cecilia Cooper (Miss. 2021). “Miss. Code Ann. § 13-5-23 (1) (Rev. 2019).”
Hyundai Motor Am. & Hyundai Motor Co. v. Joyce D. Hutton & Derek Bell (Miss. 2021). “Miss. Code Ann. § 13-5-23 (1)(b), (3)(c) (Rev.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 13-5-23(2) — 2 cases
Hyundai Motor Am. & Hyundai Motor Co. v. Joyce D. Hutton & Derek Bell (Miss. 2021). “Miss. Code Ann. § 13-5-23 (1)(b), (3)(c) (Rev.”
Hyundai Motor Am. & Hyundai Motor Co. v. Ola Mae Applewhite, as Pers. Rep. of the Est. of & Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Dorothy Mae Applewhite, Ceola Wade, as Pers. Rep. of the Est. of & Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Anthony J. Stewart, & Kenneth Cordell Carter, as Pers. Rep. of the Est. of & Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Cecilia Cooper (Miss. 2021). “Miss. Code Ann. § 13-5-23 (1) (Rev. 2019).”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 13-5-23(3)(c) — 2 cases
Hyundai Motor Am. & Hyundai Motor Co. v. Ola Mae Applewhite, as Pers. Rep. of the Est. of & Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Dorothy Mae Applewhite, Ceola Wade, as Pers. Rep. of the Est. of & Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Anthony J. Stewart, & Kenneth Cordell Carter, as Pers. Rep. of the Est. of & Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Cecilia Cooper (Miss. 2021). “Miss. Code Ann. § 13-5-23 (1) (Rev. 2019).”
Hyundai Motor Am. & Hyundai Motor Co. v. Joyce D. Hutton & Derek Bell (Miss. 2021). “Miss. Code Ann. § 13-5-23 (1)(b), (3)(c) (Rev.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 13-5-23(c) — 1 case
Hyundai Motor Am. & Hyundai Motor Co. v. Ola Mae Applewhite, as Pers. Rep. of the Est. of & Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Dorothy Mae Applewhite, Ceola Wade, as Pers. Rep. of the Est. of & Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Anthony J. Stewart, & Kenneth Cordell Carter, as Pers. Rep. of the Est. of & Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Cecilia Cooper (Miss. 2021). “Miss. Code Ann. § 13-5-23 (1) (Rev. 2019).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.