Mississippi Code
Miss. Code Ann. § 13-7-7 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of July 2026
Laws, 1993, ch. 553, § 4; reenacted without change, Laws, 1998, ch. 382, § 4, reenacted without change, Laws, 1999, ch. 480, § 4; reenacted without change, Laws, 2002, ch. 471, § 4; reenacted without change, Laws, 2011, ch. 337, § 4, eff. 7/1/2011.
Reenacted by Laws, 2014, ch. 526, SB 2484, 4, eff. 7/1/2014.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1990–2019 · leading case: Bell v. State, 678 So. 2d 994 (Miss. 1996).
Bell v. State, 678 So. 2d 994 (Miss. 1996). “§ 13-7-7(2) provides as follows: Whenever the Attorney General considers it necessary, and normal investigative or prose-cutorial procedures are not adequate, the Attorney General may petition in writing to the senior court judge of any circuit court district in this case for an…”
Joshua Day a/k/a Joshua Heath Day a/k/a Joshua H. Day v. State of Mississippi (Miss. Ct. App. 2019). “10 See Miss. Code Ann. § 13-7-7 (Rev. 2019). ¶38.”
John E. Bell v. State of Mississippi (Miss. 1990). “§ 13-7-7(2) provides as follows: Whenever the Attorney General considers it necessary, and normal investigative or prosecutorial procedures are not adequate, the Attorney General may petition in writing to the senior court judge of any circuit court district in this case for an…”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 13-7-7(2) — 2 cases
Bell v. State, 678 So. 2d 994 (Miss. 1996). “§ 13-7-7(2) provides as follows: Whenever the Attorney General considers it necessary, and normal investigative or prose-cutorial procedures are not adequate, the Attorney General may petition in writing to the senior court judge of any circuit court district in this case for an…”
John E. Bell v. State of Mississippi (Miss. 1990). “§ 13-7-7(2) provides as follows: Whenever the Attorney General considers it necessary, and normal investigative or prosecutorial procedures are not adequate, the Attorney General may petition in writing to the senior court judge of any circuit court district in this case for an…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.