Miss. Code Ann. » Miss. Code Ann. / Title 23 / Chapter 15
Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-14 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Repealed by Laws, 2004, ch. 305, § 17, eff. 7/12/2004 (the date ch. 305 was effectuated under the Voting Rights Act of 1965).

Laws, 1988, ch. 350, § 1, eff. 11/29/1988 (the date the United States Attorney General interposed no objection).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1989–2003 · leading case: Rush v. Ivy, 853 So. 2d 1226 (Miss. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rush v. Ivy, 853 So. 2d 1226 (Miss. 2003). · cites it 10× “Whether the trial court correctly interpreted, construed and applied the provisions of Miss.Code Ann. § 23-15-14 and Miss Code Ann.”
Mississippi State Chapter, Operation Push, Inc., Cross-Appellees v. Ray Mabus, Governor of Mississippi, Cross-Appellants, 932 F.2d 400 (5th Cir. 1991). “350 (codified as amended in Miss.Code Ann. §§ 23-15-14, 23-15-35, 23-15-37, 23-15-39, and 23-15-223 (Supp.”
McLaughlin v. City of Canton, Miss., 947 F. Supp. 954 (S.D. Miss. 1995). “§ 23-15-31; 17 see also Miss.Code Ann. §§ 23-15-14, 23-15-35, 23-15-43, 23-15-45, 23-15-127, 23-15-151, 25-15-153, 23-15-171, 23-15-211, 23-15-213, 23-15-219, 23-15-221, 23-15-263, 23-15-265, 23-15-963.”
Mississippi State Chapter, Operation Push v. Mabus, 717 F. Supp. 1189 (N.D. Miss. 1989). “All of these changes have been precleared by the United States Department of Justice and are codified at Miss.Code Ann. §§ 23-15-14, 23-15-35, 23-15-37, and 23-15-39 (Cum.”
Mississippi State Chapter Operation Push v. Mabus, 788 F. Supp. 1406 (N.D. Miss. 1992). “The court then offered four suggestions for changing the existing scheme as the minimum requirements for bringing registration procedures in line with the Voting Rights Act.”
Jacob M. Rush v. Carol M. Ivy (Miss. 2002). · cites it 8× “Whether the trial court correctly interpreted, construed and applied the provisions of Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-14 and Miss Code Ann.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.