Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-263 (2026)

Duties of county executive committees at primary elections

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Derived from 1942 Code § 3105 [Codes, 1906, § 3697; Hemingway's 1917, § 6388; 1930, § 5864; Repealed, 1970, ch. 506, § 33; repealed by Laws, 1986, ch. 495, § 346]; Laws, 1986, ch. 495, § 80; Laws, 1989, ch. 483, § 1; Laws, 1993, ch. 528, § 10, eff. 8/16/1993 (the date the United States Attorney General interposed no objection).


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2007–2023 · leading case: United States v. Brown, 561 F.3d 420 (5th Cir. 2009).
United States v. Brown, 561 F.3d 420 (5th Cir. 2009). · cites it 2× “See Miss.Code Ann. § 23-15-263(1) , 1 Such a task includes qualifying candidates, printing absentee ballots, preparing ballots for the polls, appointing and training poll managers and clerks to staff the polls on election day, and generally supervising the primary election.”
Mississippi State Democratic Party v. Barbour, 529 F.3d 538 (5th Cir. 2008). “Miss.Code Ann. § 23-15-263. Mississippi’s primary election statute, Miss.”
United States v. Brown, 494 F. Supp. 2d 440 (S.D. Miss. 2007). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 23-15-263. Ike Brown has been chairman of the NDEC since 2000, having been elected to the position at the county convention in 1999.”
Kevin Shows & Perry Cnty. Repub. Exec. Comm. v. Joel Garner (Miss. 2023). · cites it 2× “2018); see also Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-263 (Rev. 2018). But in Section 23-15-299, the Legislature makes no such express provision for delegation.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-263(1) — 1 case
United States v. Brown, 561 F.3d 420 (5th Cir. 2009). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 23-15-263(1) , 1 Such a task includes qualifying candidates, printing absentee ballots, preparing ballots for the polls, appointing and training poll managers and clerks to staff the polls on election day, and generally supervising the primary election.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.