Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 25-1-47 (2026)

Defense of public employees and satisfaction of judgment

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Codes, 1942, § 4049.5; Laws, 1962, 1st Ex Sess ch. 5, §§ 1-3; Laws, 1971, ch. 447, § 1, eff. 3/25/1971.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1995–2023 · leading case: Carolyn McAdams v. Sheriel F. Perkins, 204 So. 3d 1257 (Miss. 2016).
Carolyn McAdams v. Sheriel F. Perkins, 204 So. 3d 1257 (Miss. 2016). · cites it 65× “Miss. Code Ann. § 25-1-47 (1) (Rev. 2010) (emphasis added).”
Madison Cnty. v. Hopkins, 857 So. 2d 43 (Miss. 2003). · cites it 12× “The County argues the chancellor should have relied on Miss.Code Ann. §§ 25-1-47 and 19-3-47 in determining whether Sheriff Hopkins was entitled to attorney's fees.”
City of Belzoni v. Johnson, 121 So. 3d 216 (Miss. 2013). · cites it 2× “See Miss.Code Ann. § 25-1-47 (Rev.2010) (authorizing municipalities to provide legal counsel for the defense of claims, whether civil or criminal, made against municipal employees as a result of the employee's actions while acting in the capacity of such employee).”
Bd. of Aldermen of The Town of Tutwiler, Mississippi v. State of Mississippi, Off. of the State Auditor (Miss. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 6× “” Miss. Code Ann. § 25-1-47 (1) (Rev. 2018) (emphasis added).”
City of Belzoni Mississippi v. Shirley Johnson (Miss. 2012). · cites it 2× “2 See Miss. Code Ann. § 25-1-47 (Rev. 2010) (authorizing municipalities to provide legal counsel for the defense of claims, whether civil or criminal, made against municipal employees as a result of the employee’s actions while acting in the capacity of such employee).”
Hallal v. Hopkins, 947 F. Supp. 978 (S.D. Miss. 1995). · cites it 3× “§ 11-45-17 (1972) 10 and recovered damages under § 25-1-47 (1972), 11 as amended, which provides that municipalities (local governments) may defend against claims, civil or criminal, negotiate settlements and/or pay judgments from public funds.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.