Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 25-41-13 (2026)

Notice of meetings

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Laws, 1975, ch. 481, § 7; Laws, 1990, ch. 541, § 2, eff. 7/1/1990.

Amended by Laws, 2017, ch. 377, HB 1116, 1, eff. 7/1/2017.

Amended by Laws, 2013, ch. 388, SB 2070, 1, eff. 7/1/2013.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1989–2013 · leading case: Hinds Cty. Bd. of Sup'rs v. Common Cause, 551 So. 2d 107 (Miss. 1989).
Hinds Cty. Bd. of Sup'rs v. Common Cause, 551 So. 2d 107 (Miss. 1989). · cites it 2× “No notice of this meeting was given to the public, in violation of Miss. Code Ann. § 25-41-13 (1); no vote was taken to determine if executive session was necessary, in violation of Miss.”
Colom Law Firm, LLC v. Bd. of Trs., 16 So. 3d 692 (Miss. 2009). · cites it 2× “2 (“Dunn & Hemphill”), (2) an injunction requiring the School District’s Board of Trustees to comply with the Open Meetings Act, Mississippi Code Section 25-41-13, and (3) attorney’s fees.”
Rivera v. City of Laredo, 948 S.W.2d 787 (Tex. App. 1997). “In Texas, only the Texas Attorney General has attempted to address this issue; in opinion number H-1000, the attorney general stated that the statutory language means that notice must specify “each daily session.” Op. Tex. Att’y Gen. No. H-1000 (1977).”
Shipman v. North Panola Consol. Sch. Dist., 641 So. 2d 1106 (Miss. 1994). · cites it 7× “Miss.Code Ann. § 25-41-13. The NPCSD Board of Trustees is a public body for the purposes of the Open Meetings Act.”
Kanahele v. Maui Cnty. Council., 307 P.3d 1174 (Haw. 2013). “100 (West, Westlaw through 1971 Act 250) (same); Miss.Code Ann. § 25-41-13(1) (West, Westlaw through 2013 Act 388) ("notice of the place, date, hour and subject matter of any recess meeting .”
Shipman v. North Panola Consol. Sch. Dist., 641 So. 2d 1106 (Miss. 1994). · cites it 7× “Miss. Code Ann. § 25-41-13 . The NPCSD Board of Trustees is a public body for the purposes of the Open Meetings Act.”
The Colom Law Firm, LLC v. Columbus Mun. Sch. Dist. (Miss. 2008). · cites it 2× “2 (“Dunn & Hemphill”), (2) an injunction requiring the School District’s Board of Trustees to comply with the Open Meetings Act, Mississippi Code Section 25-41-13, and (3) attorney’s fees.”
Citizens for Equal Propt Right v. Lowndes Cnty, Bd of Supvrs (Miss. 1995). “Third, CEPR alleges that the Zoning Commission failed to follow § 25-41-13(2), and failed to "spread upon its minutes the times and places and the procedures by which all of its meetings are to be held.”
Cepr v. Bd. of Sup'rs of Lowndes Cnty., 730 So. 2d 1141 (Miss. 1999). “Third, CEPR alleges that the Zoning Commission failed to follow § 25-41-13(2), and failed to "spread upon its minutes the times and places and the procedures by which all of its meetings are to be held.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 25-41-13(1) — 4 cases
Rivera v. City of Laredo, 948 S.W.2d 787 (Tex. App. 1997). “In Texas, only the Texas Attorney General has attempted to address this issue; in opinion number H-1000, the attorney general stated that the statutory language means that notice must specify “each daily session.” Op. Tex. Att’y Gen. No. H-1000 (1977).”
Kanahele v. Maui Cnty. Council., 307 P.3d 1174 (Haw. 2013). “100 (West, Westlaw through 1971 Act 250) (same); Miss.Code Ann. § 25-41-13(1) (West, Westlaw through 2013 Act 388) ("notice of the place, date, hour and subject matter of any recess meeting .”
Shipman v. North Panola Consol. Sch. Dist., 641 So. 2d 1106 (Miss. 1994). “Miss.Code Ann. § 25-41-13. The NPCSD Board of Trustees is a public body for the purposes of the Open Meetings Act.”
Shipman v. North Panola Consol. Sch. Dist., 641 So. 2d 1106 (Miss. 1994). “Miss. Code Ann. § 25-41-13 . The NPCSD Board of Trustees is a public body for the purposes of the Open Meetings Act.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 25-41-13(2) — 2 cases
Citizens for Equal Propt Right v. Lowndes Cnty, Bd of Supvrs (Miss. 1995). “Third, CEPR alleges that the Zoning Commission failed to follow § 25-41-13(2), and failed to "spread upon its minutes the times and places and the procedures by which all of its meetings are to be held.”
Cepr v. Bd. of Sup'rs of Lowndes Cnty., 730 So. 2d 1141 (Miss. 1999). “Third, CEPR alleges that the Zoning Commission failed to follow § 25-41-13(2), and failed to "spread upon its minutes the times and places and the procedures by which all of its meetings are to be held.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.