Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 25-41-5 (2026)

Official meetings of public bodies to be public and open; provisions for teleconference and video meetings

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Laws, 1975, ch. 481, § 3; Laws, 2003, ch. 496, § 2; Laws, 2006, ch. 596, § 2; Laws, 2007, ch. 591, § 1; Laws, 2009, ch. 405, § 1; Laws, 2012, ch. 442, § 1, eff. 9/20/2012 (the date the United States Attorney General determined the amendments to this section were not subject to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965).

Amended by Laws, 2017, ch. 319, HB 1119, 1, eff. 7/1/2017.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1983–2025 · leading case: Ball v. Mayor & Bd. of Aldermen, 983 So. 2d 295 (Miss. 2008).
Ball v. Mayor & Bd. of Aldermen, 983 So. 2d 295 (Miss. 2008). · cites it 17× “See Miss. Code Ann. § 25-41-5 (Rev.2006). ¶ 26.”
Boyles v. Mississippi State Oil & Gas Bd., 794 So. 2d 149 (Miss. 2001). · cites it 3× “" Miss.Code Ann. § 25-41-5 (1999). ¶ 27. In carrying out its legislative mandated function, the Board exercises two very different types of power.”
Hinds Cty. Bd. of Sup'rs v. Common Cause, 551 So. 2d 107 (Miss. 1989). · cites it 2× “Miss. Code Ann. § 25-41-5 . THE TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS Most of the violations in this case involved the Board going into executive session without complying with Miss.”
Mayor of Vicksburg v. Vicksburg Printing & Publ'g Co., 434 So. 2d 1333 (Miss. 1983). · cites it 4× “Miss. Code Ann. § 25-41-5 (Supp.1982). It is our hope that what we say hereafter be found faithful to these principles and policies.”
Gannett River States Pub. Corp., Inc. v. City of Jackson, 866 So. 2d 462 (Miss. 2004). · cites it 2× “Miss.Code Ann. § 25-41-5 (Rev.2003). ¶ 36.”
Gwendolyn E. Ball v. City of Natchez, Mississippi (Miss. 2006). · cites it 15× “See Miss. Code Ann. § 25-41-5 , 2006 Miss. Laws, ch.”
Hinds Cnty. Repub. Party v. Hinds Cnty., Mississippi (S.D. Miss. 2020). · cites it 5× “” Miss. Code Ann. § 25-41-5 (3) (emphasis added).”
Mayor & City Council v. Com. Dispatch (Miss. 2017). · cites it 2× “The Final Order found that the subject gatherings had circumvented the Open Meetings Act (the Act), and by circumventing the Act, the Mayor and City Council had violated it, specifically citing Mississippi Code Section 25-41-1, Mississippi Code Section 25-41-3 and Mississippi…”
Gannett River States Publ'g Co., Inc. v. City of Jackson, Mississippi (Miss. 2002). · cites it 2× “Miss. Code Ann. § 25-41-5 (Rev. 2003). ¶36.”
Sherman Boyles v. Mississippi State Oil & Gas Bd. (Miss. 1999). · cites it 3× “" Miss. Code Ann. § 25-41-5 (1999). ¶27. In carrying out its legislative mandated function, the Board exercises two very different types of power.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 25-41-5(3) — 1 case
Hinds Cnty. Repub. Party v. Hinds Cnty., Mississippi (S.D. Miss. 2020). “” Miss. Code Ann. § 25-41-5 (3) (emphasis added).”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 25-41-5(3)(a) — 1 case
Ball v. Mayor & Bd. of Aldermen, 983 So. 2d 295 (Miss. 2008). “See Miss. Code Ann. § 25-41-5 (Rev.2006). ¶ 26.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.