Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 25-41-7 (2026)

Executive sessions

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Laws, 1975, ch. 481, § 4; Laws, 1981, ch. 456, § 1; Laws, 1990, ch. 541, § 1; Laws, 2007, ch. 305, § 2, eff. 3/7/2007.

Amended by Laws, 2021, ch. 393, HB 1323,§ 1, eff. 7/1/2021.

Amended by Laws, 2015, ch. 484, SB 2407, 2, eff. 1/1/2016.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases, 1983–2017 · leading case: Hinds Cty. Bd. of Sup'rs v. Common Cause, 551 So. 2d 107 (Miss. 1989).
Hinds Cty. Bd. of Sup'rs v. Common Cause, 551 So. 2d 107 (Miss. 1989). · cites it 55× “THE TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS Most of the violations in this case involved the Board going into executive session without complying with Miss. Code Ann. § 25-41-7 , set forth in full in Appendix A.”
BD. OF Trs. v. Miss. Publishers Corp., 478 So. 2d 269 (Miss. 1985). · cites it 14× “The Board notes an alleged inconsistency within the Act, in that § 25-41-7 provides: The total vote on the question of entering into an executive session shall be recorded and spread upon the minutes of such body.”
Gannett River States Pub. Corp., Inc. v. City of Jackson, 866 So. 2d 462 (Miss. 2004). · cites it 7× “Miss.Code Ann. § 25-41-7 (Rev.2003). This Court has previously set forth factors to be considered where, as here, public bodies attempt to use a "social function" to circumvent or *472 defeat the purposes of the Act.”
Ball v. Mayor & Bd. of Aldermen, 983 So. 2d 295 (Miss. 2008). · cites it 4× “he 2006 proceeding, Mississippi Code Annotated Section § 25-41-5 provided: (1) All official meetings of any public body, unless otherwise provided in this chapter or in the Constitutions of the United States of America or the State of Mississippi, are declared to be public…”
Mayor of Vicksburg v. Vicksburg Printing & Publ'g Co., 434 So. 2d 1333 (Miss. 1983). · cites it 8× “Miss.Code Ann. § 25-41-7 (Supp.1982). The meeting in question clearly related to prospective litigation.”
Miss. State Bd. of Nursing v. Wilson, 624 So. 2d 485 (Miss. 1993). “This argument is devoid of merit because of the "litigation" exception found in § 25-41-7(4)(b) which authorizes a public body to hold executive sessions for the purpose of "[s]trategy sessions or negotiations with respect to prospective litigation, litigation or issuance of an…”
Reading Eagle Co. v. Council of City of Reading, 627 A.2d 305 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1993). “The relevant part of the Mississippi Open Meetings Act, Miss.Code Ann. § 25-41-7(3), Ch. 481, Laws 1975, is essentially identical to our Sunshine Act, stating only that "[t]he reason for holding such an executive session shall be stated in an open meeting.”
Lacroix v. Marshall Cnty. Bd. of Sup'rs, 28 So. 3d 650 (Miss. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “See Miss.Code Ann. § 25-41-7(4) (Rev.2006). ¶ 28.”
LaCroix v. Marshall Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors, 28 So. 3d 650 (Miss. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “See Miss.Code Ann. § 25-41-7(4) (Rev.2006). ¶ 28.”
Gannett River States Publ'g Co., Inc. v. City of Jackson, Mississippi (Miss. 2002). · cites it 7× “The Legislature has outlined the procedure for holding an executive session in Miss. Code Ann. § 25-41-7 (4). This Court has interpreted that statute and has also outlined the procedure for holding an executive session in Hinds County Board of Supervisors, 551 So.”
Freda Howell v. Bd. of Supervisors of Jefferson Davis Cnty., Mississippi, 179 So. 3d 34 (Miss. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 4× “2010) (establishing open-meetings requirements for public boards and public meetings); Miss. Code Ann. § 25-41-7 (Rev. 2010) (establishing exemptions from open-meetings requirements and setting forth what a public body may address in executive session); Miss.”
Gwendolyn E. Ball v. City of Natchez, Mississippi (Miss. 2006). · cites it 2× “(2) A public body may conduct any meeting, other than an executive session called pursuant to Section 25-41-7, wherein public business is discussed or transacted, through teleconference or video means.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 25-41-7(3) — 1 case
Reading Eagle Co. v. Council of City of Reading, 627 A.2d 305 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1993). “The relevant part of the Mississippi Open Meetings Act, Miss.Code Ann. § 25-41-7(3), Ch. 481, Laws 1975, is essentially identical to our Sunshine Act, stating only that "[t]he reason for holding such an executive session shall be stated in an open meeting.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 25-41-7(4) — 6 cases
BD. OF Trs. v. Miss. Publishers Corp., 478 So. 2d 269 (Miss. 1985). “The Board notes an alleged inconsistency within the Act, in that § 25-41-7 provides: The total vote on the question of entering into an executive session shall be recorded and spread upon the minutes of such body.”
Gannett River States Pub. Corp., Inc. v. City of Jackson, 866 So. 2d 462 (Miss. 2004). “Miss.Code Ann. § 25-41-7 (Rev.2003). This Court has previously set forth factors to be considered where, as here, public bodies attempt to use a "social function" to circumvent or *472 defeat the purposes of the Act.”
Hinds Cty. Bd. of Sup'rs v. Common Cause, 551 So. 2d 107 (Miss. 1989). “THE TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS Most of the violations in this case involved the Board going into executive session without complying with Miss. Code Ann. § 25-41-7 , set forth in full in Appendix A.”
Lacroix v. Marshall Cnty. Bd. of Sup'rs, 28 So. 3d 650 (Miss. Ct. App. 2009). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 25-41-7(4) (Rev.2006). ¶ 28.”
LaCroix v. Marshall Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors, 28 So. 3d 650 (Miss. Ct. App. 2009). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 25-41-7(4) (Rev.2006). ¶ 28.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 25-41-7(4)(a) — 1 case
BD. OF Trs. v. Miss. Publishers Corp., 478 So. 2d 269 (Miss. 1985). “The Board notes an alleged inconsistency within the Act, in that § 25-41-7 provides: The total vote on the question of entering into an executive session shall be recorded and spread upon the minutes of such body.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 25-41-7(4)(b) — 2 cases
Mayor of Vicksburg v. Vicksburg Printing & Publ'g Co., 434 So. 2d 1333 (Miss. 1983). “Miss.Code Ann. § 25-41-7 (Supp.1982). The meeting in question clearly related to prospective litigation.”
Miss. State Bd. of Nursing v. Wilson, 624 So. 2d 485 (Miss. 1993). “This argument is devoid of merit because of the "litigation" exception found in § 25-41-7(4)(b) which authorizes a public body to hold executive sessions for the purpose of "[s]trategy sessions or negotiations with respect to prospective litigation, litigation or issuance of an…”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 25-41-7(4)(k) — 1 case
BD. OF Trs. v. Miss. Publishers Corp., 478 So. 2d 269 (Miss. 1985). “The Board notes an alleged inconsistency within the Act, in that § 25-41-7 provides: The total vote on the question of entering into an executive session shall be recorded and spread upon the minutes of such body.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.