Mississippi Code
Miss. Code Ann. § 25-43-1 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of July 2026
Laws, 1976, ch. 487, § 1, eff from and after January 1, 1977, eff from and after July 1, 2005; Repealed by Laws, 2003, ch. 304, § 26, effective July 1, 2005.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases, 1986–2020 · leading case: City of Belmont v. Miss. State Tax Comm'n, 860 So. 2d 289 (Miss. 2003).
City of Belmont v. Miss. State Tax Comm'n, 860 So. 2d 289 (Miss. 2003). “[12] The Administrative Procedures Law, Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-1 to 19 (Rev.1999).”
USPCI of Miss. v. State Ex Rel. McGowan, 688 So. 2d 783 (Miss. 1997). “§ 25-43-5 (1972) dictated that the Governor's Office (Governor) of the State of Mississippi is an "agency" within the meaning intended by the Administrative Procedures Law (APL), Miss. Code Ann. § 25-43-1 et seq. (Supp. 1995) and that any capacity assurance plan was a "rule"…”
State Oil & Gas Bd. v. McGowan, 542 So. 2d 244 (Miss. 1989). “1988), which provides: (1) In addition to other rule-making authority and requirements imposed by law, each agency shall: (a) Adopt as a rule a description of its organization, stating the general course and method of its operations and the methods whereby the public may obtain…”
Pro-Choice Mississippi v. Fordice, 716 So. 2d 645 (Miss. 1998). “Such rules, regulations and standards shall be adopted and promulgated by the licensing agency in accordance with the provisions of Section 25-43-1 et seq., and shall be recorded and indexed in a book to be maintained by the licensing agency in its main office in the State of…”
Div. of Medicaid v. Mississippi Indep. Pharmacies Ass'n, 20 So. 3d 1236 (Miss. 2009). “2009); Miss.Code Ann. § 25-43-1 (Rev.2006). Additionally, Section 43-13-117(9)(b) provides the method and rate of reimbursement to providers of multi-source drugs (generic drugs).”
Watkins v. Mississippi Bd. of Bar Admissions, 659 So. 2d 561 (Miss. 1995). “DID THE CHANCERY COURT ERR WHEN IT FAILED TO ADDRESS THE ARGUMENT THAT THE BOARD VIOLATED THE MISSISSIPPI ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ACT BY NOT FILING AMENDMENTS WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE? Examinees argue that Mississippi Code Annotated Section 25-43-1 of the Mississippi *572…”
All Am. Check Cashing, Inc. v. Corley, 191 F. Supp. 3d 646 (S.D. Miss. 2016). “ts out that the provisions of the Mississippi Check Cashers Act and Title Pledge Act requiring that any license revocation be preceded by notice and a hearing state that the manner of giving notice and conducting such “shall be performed in accordance with procedures prescribed…”
McDonald v. Bd. of Mississippi Levee Commissioners, 646 F. Supp. 449 (N.D. Miss. 1986). “Administrative Procedures Act The plaintiff has also claimed that the Levee Board has violated the Mississippi Administrative Procedures Act, Miss.Code § 25-43-1, et seq. (1977). Inasmuch as the relief sought in this claim has heretofore been granted by the court on other…”
Davis v. Mann, 721 F. Supp. 796 (S.D. Miss. 1988). “Davis asserts that his dismissal violated the Mississippi Administrative Procedures Law (MAPL), Miss.Code Ann. §§ 25-43-1 through 25-43-19, in that the decision to dismiss him was not based on substantial evidence appearing in the record.”
Methodist Specialty Care Ctr. v. Mississippi Div. of Medicaid & Drew Snyder, in his Off. capacity as Dir. of the Mississippi Div. of Medicaid (Miss. 2020). ““The [DOM] is an agency as defined under Section 25-43-3 and, therefore, must comply in all respects with the Administrative Procedures Law, Section 25-43-1 et seq.” Miss. Code Ann. § 43-13-137 (Rev.”
Div. of Medicaid v. Mississippi Indep. Pharmacies Ass'n (Miss. 2008). “2009); Miss. Code Ann. § 25-43-1 (Rev. 2006). Additionally, Section 43- 13-117(9)(b) provides the method and rate of reimbursement to providers of multi-source drugs (generic drugs).”
USPCI of MS Inc v. State of MS (Miss. 1994). “§ 25-43-5 (1972) dictated that the Governor's Office (Governor) of the State of Mississippi is an "agency" within the meaning intended by the Administrative Procedures Law (APL), Miss.Code Ann. § 25-43-1 et seq. (Supp. 1995) and that any capacity assurance plan was a "rule"…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.