Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153 (2026)

Forfeitures

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Codes, 1942, § 6831-79; Laws, 1971, ch. 521, § 29; Laws, 1972, ch. 520, § 12; Laws, 1979, ch. 473, § 5; Laws, 1981, ch. 502, § 9; Laws, 1982, ch. 323, § 3; Laws, 1985, ch. 388, § 2. Reenacted without change, Laws, 1996, ch. 511, § 1; Laws, 1999, ch. 417, § 1; Laws, 2005, ch. 463, § 1; Laws, 2007, ch. 327, § 1, eff. 7/1/2007.

Amended by Laws, 2023, ch. 436, HB 1158,§ 10, eff. 3/27/2023.

Amended by Laws, 2017, ch. 329, HB 812, 3, eff. 7/1/2017.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 39 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1983–2022 · leading case: Lewis v. State Ex Rel. Lamar Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 199 So. 3d 1245 (Miss. 2016).
Lewis v. State Ex Rel. Lamar Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 199 So. 3d 1245 (Miss. 2016). · cites it 6× “Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153 (a) (1), (2), (4), (5), (7) (Rev.”
One Hundred Thirty-Seven Thousand Three Hundred Twenty-Five Dollars ($137,325.00) in United States Currency v. State Ex Rel. Pelahatchie Police Dep't, 204 So. 3d 317 (Miss. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 4× “See Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153 (Rev. 2013). On appeal from the circuit court’s judgment, Bobo asserts the following issues: (1) whether his attorney provided ineffective assistance of counsel; (2) whether the State unreasonably extended the traffic stop and unlawfully seized…”
Jones v. State Ex Rel. Mississippi Dps, 607 So. 2d 23 (Miss. 1991). · cites it 2× “Forfeiture of "all money" used or intended for use in violation of Mississippi's Uniform Controlled Substance Law is provided for in Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153 (a)(5) and § 41-29-153(a)(7) (1972, as amended).”
Jackson v. State Ex Rel. Bur. of Narcotics, 591 So. 2d 820 (Miss. 1991). · cites it 3× “00 in currency and an automobile owned by Jackson pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153 (a)(4) & (5).”
Evans v. City of Aberdeen, 925 So. 2d 850 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “Miss.Code Ann. § 41-29-153(a)(7) (Rev. 2001).”
Neely v. State Ex Rel. Tate Cnty., 628 So. 2d 1376 (Miss. 1993). · cites it 2× “Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153 (a)(5) and (a)(7) (Supp.”
Sample v. State, 643 So. 2d 524 (Miss. 1994). “By virtue of Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153 (Supp. 1992), all money which is used or intended for use in violation of the Uniform Controlled Substances Law, § 41-29-101 et seq.”
Rooks v. State, 529 So. 2d 546 (Miss. 1988). “This activity furnished a classic case of probable cause that these men were carrying contraband. They were observed by a thoroughly reliable person, with some experience in law enforcement, who reported the entire activity to the sheriff.”
One (1) Charter Arms v. State, 721 So. 2d 620 (Miss. 1998). · cites it 2× “The majority's hybrid instrumentality—proportionality test is unnecessary and invades the prerogative of and the intent of the Mississippi Legislature in passing Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153 (a)(4). This effectively removes the teeth from the statute which attempts to "take a…”
State v. Spooner, 520 So. 2d 336 (La. 1988). “"); Miss.Code Ann. § 41-29-153 (Supp.1986) (preponderance); Reed v.”
One Hundred Seven Thousand Dollars ($107,000.00) U.S. Currency v. State, ex rel. Harrison Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't ex rel. Gulf Coast Multijurisdictional Task Force, 643 So. 2d 917 (Miss. 1994). · cites it 2× “Miss.Code Ann. § 41-29-153(a)(5) & (7) states: (a) The following are subject to forfeiture: (5) All money, deadly weapons, books, records, and research products and materials, including formulas, microfilm, tapes and data which are used, or intended for use, in violation of this…”
Curtis v. State, 642 So. 2d 381 (Miss. 1994). · cites it 2× “Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153 further sets forth: (a) The following are subject to forfeiture: (4) All conveyances, including .”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153(a) — 1 case
— Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153(a)(4) — 4 cases
United States v. James Hamilton, 931 F.2d 1046 (5th Cir. 1991).
One (1) Charter Arms v. State, 721 So. 2d 620 (Miss. 1998). “The majority's hybrid instrumentality—proportionality test is unnecessary and invades the prerogative of and the intent of the Mississippi Legislature in passing Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153 (a)(4). This effectively removes the teeth from the statute which attempts to "take a…”
2004 Chevrolet Pickup v. State, 970 So. 2d 186 (Miss. Ct. App. 2007).
One (1) 1992 Isuzu Rodeo v. Grenada Police Dep't, 743 So. 2d 1062 (Miss. Ct. App. 1999).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153(a)(5) — 1 case
One Hundred Seven Thousand Dollars ($107,000.00) U.S. Currency v. State, ex rel. Harrison Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't ex rel. Gulf Coast Multijurisdictional Task Force, 643 So. 2d 917 (Miss. 1994). “Miss.Code Ann. § 41-29-153(a)(5) & (7) states: (a) The following are subject to forfeiture: (5) All money, deadly weapons, books, records, and research products and materials, including formulas, microfilm, tapes and data which are used, or intended for use, in violation of this…”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153(a)(7) — 4 cases
Evans v. City of Aberdeen, 925 So. 2d 850 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005). “Miss.Code Ann. § 41-29-153(a)(7) (Rev. 2001).”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153(b)(4) — 3 cases
One Hundred Seven Thousand Dollars ($107,000.00) U.S. Currency v. State, ex rel. Harrison Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't ex rel. Gulf Coast Multijurisdictional Task Force, 643 So. 2d 917 (Miss. 1994). “Miss.Code Ann. § 41-29-153(a)(5) & (7) states: (a) The following are subject to forfeiture: (5) All money, deadly weapons, books, records, and research products and materials, including formulas, microfilm, tapes and data which are used, or intended for use, in violation of this…”
One 1992 Toyota v. State, 721 So. 2d 609 (Miss. 1998).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.