Mississippi Code
Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153 (2026)
Forfeitures
✓ current as of July 2026
- (a) The following are subject to forfeiture:
- (1) All controlled substances which have been manufactured, distributed, dispensed or acquired in violation of this article or in violation of Article 5 of this chapter or Chapter 137 of this title;
- (2) All raw materials, products and equipment of any kind which are used, or intended for use, in manufacturing, compounding, processing, delivering, importing, or exporting any controlled substance in violation of this article or in violation of Article 5 of this chapter or Chapter 137 of this title;
- (3) All property which is used, or intended for use, as a container for property described in paragraph (1) or (2) of this subsection;
- (4) All conveyances, including aircraft, vehicles or vessels, which are used, or intended for use, to transport, or in any manner to facilitate the transportation, sale, receipt, possession or concealment of property described in paragraph (1) or (2) of this subsection, however:
- A. No conveyance used by any person as a common carrier in the transaction of business as a common carrier is subject to forfeiture under this section unless it appears that the owner or other person in charge of the conveyance is a consenting party or privy to a violation of this article;
- B. No conveyance is subject to forfeiture under this section by reason of any act or omission proved by the owner thereof to have been committed or omitted without his knowledge or consent; if the confiscating authority has reason to believe that the conveyance is a leased or rented conveyance, then the confiscating authority shall notify the owner of the conveyance within five (5) days of the confiscation;
- C. A forfeiture of a conveyance encumbered by a bona fide security interest is subject to the interest of the secured party if he neither had knowledge of nor consented to the act or omission;
- D. A conveyance is not subject to forfeiture for a violation of Section 41-29-139(c)(2)(A) 1, 2 or (B)1 or (C)1, 2, 3;
- (5) All money, deadly weapons, books, records, and research products and materials, including formulas, microfilm, tapes and data which are used, or intended for use, in violation of this article or in violation of Article 5 of this chapter or Chapter 137 of this title;
- (6) All drug paraphernalia as defined in Section 41-29-105(v); and
- (7) Everything of value, including real estate, furnished, or intended to be furnished, in exchange for a controlled substance in violation of this article, all proceeds traceable to such an exchange, and all monies, negotiable instruments, businesses or business investments, securities, and other things of value used, or intended to be used, to facilitate any violation of this article. All monies, coin and currency found in close proximity to forfeitable controlled substances, to forfeitable drug manufacturing or distributing paraphernalia, or to forfeitable records of the importation, manufacture or distribution of controlled substances are presumed to be forfeitable under this paragraph; the burden of proof is upon claimants of the property to rebut this presumption.
- A. No property shall be forfeited under the provisions of subsection (a)(7) of this section, to the extent of the interest of an owner, by reason of any act or omission established by him to have been committed or omitted without his knowledge or consent.
- B. Neither personal property encumbered by a bona fide security interest nor real estate encumbered by a bona fide mortgage, deed of trust, lien or encumbrance shall be forfeited under the provisions of subsection (a)(7) of this section, to the extent of the interest of the secured party or the interest of the mortgagee, holder of a deed of trust, lien or encumbrance by reason of any act or omission established by him to have been committed or omitted without his knowledge or consent.
- (b) Property subject to forfeiture may be seized by the bureau, local law enforcement officers, enforcement officers of the Mississippi Department of Transportation, highway patrolmen, the board, the State Board of Pharmacy, or law enforcement officers of the Mississippi Department of Revenue or Mississippi Department of Health acting with their duties in accordance with the Mississippi Medical Cannabis Act, upon process issued by any appropriate court having jurisdiction over the property. Seizure without process may be made if:
- (1) The seizure is incident to an arrest or a search under a search warrant or an inspection under an administrative inspection warrant;
- (2) The property subject to seizure has been the subject of a prior judgment in favor of the state in a criminal injunction or forfeiture proceeding based upon this article;
- (3) The bureau, the board, local law enforcement officers, enforcement officers of the Mississippi Department of Transportation, or highway patrolmen, the State Board of Pharmacy, or law enforcement officers of the Mississippi Department of Revenue or Mississippi Department of Health acting with their duties in accordance with the Mississippi Medical Cannabis Act, have probable cause to believe that the property is directly or indirectly dangerous to health or safety;
- (4) The bureau, local law enforcement officers, enforcement officers of the Mississippi Department of Transportation, highway patrolmen, the board, the State Board of Pharmacy, or law enforcement officers of the Mississippi Department of Revenue or Mississippi Department of Health acting with their duties in accordance with the Mississippi Medical Cannabis Act, have probable cause to believe that the property was used or is intended to be used in violation of this article; or
- (5) The seizing law enforcement agency obtained a seizure warrant as described in subsection (f) of this section.
- (c) Controlled substances listed in Schedule I of Section 41-29-113 that are possessed, transferred, sold, or offered for sale in violation of this article are contraband and shall be seized and summarily forfeited to the state. Controlled substances listed in the said Schedule I, which are seized or come into the possession of the state, the owners of which are unknown, are contraband and shall be summarily forfeited to the state.
- (d) Species of plants from which controlled substances in Schedules I and II of Sections 41-29-113 and 41-29-115 may be derived which have been planted or cultivated in violation of this article, or of which the owners or cultivators are unknown, or which are wild growths, may be seized and summarily forfeited to the state.
- (e) The failure, upon demand by the bureau and/or local law enforcement officers, or their authorized agents, or highway patrolmen designated by the bureau, the board, the State Board of Pharmacy, or law enforcement officers of the Mississippi Department of Revenue or Mississippi Department of Health acting with their duties in accordance with the Mississippi Medical Cannabis Act, of the person in occupancy or in control of land or premises upon which the species of plants are growing or being stored, to produce an appropriate registration, or proof that he is the holder thereof, constitutes authority for the seizure and forfeiture of the plants.
- (f)
- (1) When any property is seized under the Uniform Controlled Substances Law, except as otherwise provided in paragraph (3) of this subsection, by a law enforcement agency with the intent to be forfeited, the law enforcement agency that seized the property shall obtain a seizure warrant from the county or circuit court having jurisdiction of such property within seventy-two (72) hours of any seizure, excluding weekends and holidays. Any law enforcement agency that fails to obtain a seizure warrant within seventy-two (72) hours as required by this section shall notify the person from whom the property was seized that it will not be forfeited and shall provide written instructions advising the person how to retrieve the seized property.
- (2) A circuit or county judge having jurisdiction of any property other than a controlled substance, raw material or paraphernalia, may issue a seizure warrant upon proper oath or affirmation from a law enforcement agency. The law enforcement agency that is seeking a seizure warrant shall provide the following information to the judge:
- A. Probable cause to believe that the property was used or intended to be used in violation of this article;
- B. The name of the person from whom the property was seized; and
- C. A detailed description of the property which is seized, including the value of the property.
- (3) This subsection does not apply to seizures performed pursuant to Section 41-29-157 when property is specifically set forth in a search and seizure warrant.
Codes, 1942, § 6831-79; Laws, 1971, ch. 521, § 29; Laws, 1972, ch. 520, § 12; Laws, 1979, ch. 473, § 5; Laws, 1981, ch. 502, § 9; Laws, 1982, ch. 323, § 3; Laws, 1985, ch. 388, § 2. Reenacted without change, Laws, 1996, ch. 511, § 1; Laws, 1999, ch. 417, § 1; Laws, 2005, ch. 463, § 1; Laws, 2007, ch. 327, § 1, eff. 7/1/2007.
Amended by Laws, 2023, ch. 436, HB 1158,§ 10, eff. 3/27/2023.
Amended by Laws, 2017, ch. 329, HB 812, 3, eff. 7/1/2017.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 39
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1983–2022 · leading case: Lewis v. State Ex Rel. Lamar Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 199 So. 3d 1245 (Miss. 2016).
Lewis v. State Ex Rel. Lamar Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 199 So. 3d 1245 (Miss. 2016). “Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153 (a) (1), (2), (4), (5), (7) (Rev.”
One Hundred Thirty-Seven Thousand Three Hundred Twenty-Five Dollars ($137,325.00) in United States Currency v. State Ex Rel. Pelahatchie Police Dep't, 204 So. 3d 317 (Miss. Ct. App. 2016). “See Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153 (Rev. 2013). On appeal from the circuit court’s judgment, Bobo asserts the following issues: (1) whether his attorney provided ineffective assistance of counsel; (2) whether the State unreasonably extended the traffic stop and unlawfully seized…”
Jones v. State Ex Rel. Mississippi Dps, 607 So. 2d 23 (Miss. 1991). “Forfeiture of "all money" used or intended for use in violation of Mississippi's Uniform Controlled Substance Law is provided for in Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153 (a)(5) and § 41-29-153(a)(7) (1972, as amended).”
Jackson v. State Ex Rel. Bur. of Narcotics, 591 So. 2d 820 (Miss. 1991). “00 in currency and an automobile owned by Jackson pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153 (a)(4) & (5).”
Evans v. City of Aberdeen, 925 So. 2d 850 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005). “Miss.Code Ann. § 41-29-153(a)(7) (Rev. 2001).”
Neely v. State Ex Rel. Tate Cnty., 628 So. 2d 1376 (Miss. 1993). “Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153 (a)(5) and (a)(7) (Supp.”
Sample v. State, 643 So. 2d 524 (Miss. 1994). “By virtue of Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153 (Supp. 1992), all money which is used or intended for use in violation of the Uniform Controlled Substances Law, § 41-29-101 et seq.”
Rooks v. State, 529 So. 2d 546 (Miss. 1988). “This activity furnished a classic case of probable cause that these men were carrying contraband. They were observed by a thoroughly reliable person, with some experience in law enforcement, who reported the entire activity to the sheriff.”
One (1) Charter Arms v. State, 721 So. 2d 620 (Miss. 1998). “The majority's hybrid instrumentalityproportionality test is unnecessary and invades the prerogative of and the intent of the Mississippi Legislature in passing Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153 (a)(4). This effectively removes the teeth from the statute which attempts to "take a…”
State v. Spooner, 520 So. 2d 336 (La. 1988). “"); Miss.Code Ann. § 41-29-153 (Supp.1986) (preponderance); Reed v.”
One Hundred Seven Thousand Dollars ($107,000.00) U.S. Currency v. State, ex rel. Harrison Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't ex rel. Gulf Coast Multijurisdictional Task Force, 643 So. 2d 917 (Miss. 1994). “Miss.Code Ann. § 41-29-153(a)(5) & (7) states: (a) The following are subject to forfeiture: (5) All money, deadly weapons, books, records, and research products and materials, including formulas, microfilm, tapes and data which are used, or intended for use, in violation of this…”
Curtis v. State, 642 So. 2d 381 (Miss. 1994). “Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153 further sets forth: (a) The following are subject to forfeiture: (4) All conveyances, including .”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153(a) — 1 case
Hickman v. State ex rel. Mississippi Dep't of Pub. Saf., 592 So. 2d 44 (Miss. 1991).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153(a)(4) — 4 cases
United States v. James Hamilton, 931 F.2d 1046 (5th Cir. 1991).
One (1) Charter Arms v. State, 721 So. 2d 620 (Miss. 1998). “The majority's hybrid instrumentalityproportionality test is unnecessary and invades the prerogative of and the intent of the Mississippi Legislature in passing Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153 (a)(4). This effectively removes the teeth from the statute which attempts to "take a…”
2004 Chevrolet Pickup v. State, 970 So. 2d 186 (Miss. Ct. App. 2007).
One (1) 1992 Isuzu Rodeo v. Grenada Police Dep't, 743 So. 2d 1062 (Miss. Ct. App. 1999).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153(a)(5) — 1 case
One Hundred Seven Thousand Dollars ($107,000.00) U.S. Currency v. State, ex rel. Harrison Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't ex rel. Gulf Coast Multijurisdictional Task Force, 643 So. 2d 917 (Miss. 1994). “Miss.Code Ann. § 41-29-153(a)(5) & (7) states: (a) The following are subject to forfeiture: (5) All money, deadly weapons, books, records, and research products and materials, including formulas, microfilm, tapes and data which are used, or intended for use, in violation of this…”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153(a)(7) — 4 cases
Evans v. City of Aberdeen, 925 So. 2d 850 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005). “Miss.Code Ann. § 41-29-153(a)(7) (Rev. 2001).”
Six Thousand Dollars v. State Ex Rel. Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics, 179 So. 3d 1 (Miss. 2015).
One Ford Mustang Convertible Bearing Vin 1FACP45EXLF192944 v. State ex rel. Clay Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 676 So. 2d 905 (Miss. 1996).
Six Thousand Dollars v. State Ex Rel. Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics, 179 So. 3d 7 (Miss. Ct. App. 2014).
— Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-153(b)(4) — 3 cases
One Hundred Seven Thousand Dollars ($107,000.00) U.S. Currency v. State, ex rel. Harrison Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't ex rel. Gulf Coast Multijurisdictional Task Force, 643 So. 2d 917 (Miss. 1994). “Miss.Code Ann. § 41-29-153(a)(5) & (7) states: (a) The following are subject to forfeiture: (5) All money, deadly weapons, books, records, and research products and materials, including formulas, microfilm, tapes and data which are used, or intended for use, in violation of this…”
One 1992 Toyota v. State, 721 So. 2d 609 (Miss. 1998).
Toyota 4-Runner 1992 v. State of MS (Miss. 1994).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.