Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-157 (2026)

Administrative inspection warrants and search warrants

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Codes, 1942, § 6831-76; Laws, 1971, ch. 521, § 26; Laws, 1972, ch. 520, § 11; Laws, 1981, ch. 502, § 14; Laws, 1992, ch. 580, § 5; Laws, 2001, ch. 470, § 4; Laws, 2005, ch. 404, § 8, eff. 7/1/2005.

Amended by Laws, 2017, ch. 329, HB 812, 4, eff. 7/1/2017.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1991–2017 · leading case: City of West Covina v. Perkins, 525 U.S. 234 (1999).
City of West Covina v. Perkins, 525 U.S. 234 (1999). · cites it 2× “1998); Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-157 (a)(3) (1981), § 99-27-15 (1994); Mo.”
State v. Boyse, 2013 NMSC 024 (N.M. 2013). “Compare Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-157 (a)(2) (2005) (requiring search warrant affidavits to be “sworn to [in person] before the judge,” see White, 842 So.”
White v. State, 842 So. 2d 565 (Miss. 2003). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 41-29-157(a)(2) (2001). The form of an affidavit for a search warrant also indicates the presence of the affiant at issuance.”
Williams v. State, 583 So. 2d 620 (Miss. 1991). · cites it 2× “True, Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-157 (1972) mandates If property is seized pursuant to a warrant, a copy shall be given to the person from whom or from whose premises the property is taken .”
Donald Mitchell v. State of Mississippi, 218 So. 3d 278 (Miss. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “” Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-157 (a)(3). Rule 4.”
Terry Smith v. The State of Wyoming, 2013 WY 122 (Wyo. 2013). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 41-29-157(2)(@) (2001). The form of an affidavit for a search warrant also indicates the presence of the affiant at issuance.”
White v. State, 746 So. 2d 953 (Miss. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “First, White points out that while Mississippi at one time had a statute, Miss.Code Ann. § 41-29-157(c) (Rev.1993), which specifically allowed "no-knock" searches, the particular subsection allowing "no-knock" searches was automatically repealed after July 1, 1974 and is no…”
Chester v. State, 935 So. 2d 976 (Miss. 2006). “While Miss.Code Ann. § 41-29-157(a)(3) (Rev.2005) clearly dictates Chester should have received a copy of the warrant, we have never held that failure to follow this procedure constitutes reversible error or voids an otherwise valid search.”
State v. Boyse, 2013 NMSC 24 (N.M. 2013). “Compare Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-157 (a)(2) (2005) (requiring search warrant affidavits to be “sworn to [in person] before the judge,” see White, 842 So.”
James v. White v. State of Mississippi (Miss. 2000). “See Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-157 (a)(2) (2001).”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-157(2) — 1 case
Terry Smith v. The State of Wyoming, 2013 WY 122 (Wyo. 2013). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 41-29-157(2)(@) (2001). The form of an affidavit for a search warrant also indicates the presence of the affiant at issuance.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-157(a)(2) — 1 case
White v. State, 842 So. 2d 565 (Miss. 2003). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 41-29-157(a)(2) (2001). The form of an affidavit for a search warrant also indicates the presence of the affiant at issuance.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-157(a)(3) — 1 case
Chester v. State, 935 So. 2d 976 (Miss. 2006). “While Miss.Code Ann. § 41-29-157(a)(3) (Rev.2005) clearly dictates Chester should have received a copy of the warrant, we have never held that failure to follow this procedure constitutes reversible error or voids an otherwise valid search.”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-157(c) — 1 case
White v. State, 746 So. 2d 953 (Miss. Ct. App. 1999). “First, White points out that while Mississippi at one time had a statute, Miss.Code Ann. § 41-29-157(c) (Rev.1993), which specifically allowed "no-knock" searches, the particular subsection allowing "no-knock" searches was automatically repealed after July 1, 1974 and is no…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.