Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-535 (2026)

Applicability of article

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This article shall not apply to a person who is a subscriber to a telephone operated by a communication common carrier and who intercepts a communication on a telephone to which he subscribes. This article shall not apply to persons who are members of the household of the subscriber who intercept communications on a telephone in the home of the subscriber.

Laws, 1989, ch. 553, § 18; repealed, Laws, 1989, ch. 553, § 19; enacted, Laws, 1992, ch. 561, § 18; reenacted without change, Laws, 2004, ch. 511, § 18, eff. 7/1/2004.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1995–2001 · leading case: Lee v. Lee, 798 So. 2d 1284 (Miss. 2001).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Lee v. Lee, 798 So. 2d 1284 (Miss. 2001). “Under Miss.Code Ann. § 41-29-535 (1993), "a person who is a subscriber to a telephone operated by a communication common carrier and who intercepts a communication on a telephone to which he subscribes" is allowed to tap that telephone.”

Wright v. Stanley, 700 So. 2d 274 (Miss. 1997). “Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-535 (1993) provides: This article shall not apply to a person who is a subscriber to a telephone operated by a communication common carrier and who intercepts a communication on a telephone to which he subscribes.”

Donna Rogers v. Mark Morin (Miss. 1998). · cites it 2× “§ 41-29-535 (1993) provides: This article shall not apply to a person who is a subscriber to a telephone operated by a communication common carrier and who intercepts a communication on a telephone to which he subscribes. This article shall not apply to persons who are members…”

J Stephen Wright v. Carol P Stanley (Miss. 1995). “Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-535 (1993) provides: This article shall not apply to a person who is a subscriber to a telephone operated by a communication common carrier and who intercepts a communication on a telephone to which he subscribes.”

Belinda Quin Lee v. Jason Gilliam Lee (Miss. 2000). “Under Miss. Code Ann. § 41-29-535 (1993), "a person who is a subscriber to a telephone operated by a communication common carrier and who intercepts a communication on a telephone to which he subscribes" is allowed to tap that telephone.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.