For purposes of Sections 47-5-1001 through 47-5-1015, the following words shall have the meaning ascribed herein unless the context shall otherwise require:
- (a) "Approved electronic monitoring device" means a device approved by the department which is primarily intended to record and transmit information regarding the offender's presence or nonpresence in the home.
- (b) "Correctional field officer" means the supervising probation and parole officer in charge of supervising the offender.
- (c) "Court" means a circuit court having jurisdiction to place an offender into the intensive supervision program.
- (d) "Department" means the Department of Corrections.
- (e) "House arrest" means the confinement of a person convicted or charged with a crime to his place of residence under the terms and conditions established by the department or court.
- (f) "Operating capacity" means the total number of state offenders which can be safely and reasonably housed in facilities operated by the department and in local or county jails or other facilities authorized to house state offenders as certified by the department, subject to applicable federal and state laws and rules and regulations.
- (g) "Participant" means an offender placed into an intensive supervision program.
Laws, 1993, ch. 576, § 1; Laws, 1994, ch. 606, § 2; reenacted without change, Laws, 1999, ch. 539, § 1; reenacted without change, Laws, 2001, ch. 482, § 2; reenacted without change, Laws, 2003, ch. 418, § 1; reenacted without change, Laws, 2005, ch. 485, § 2; reenacted without change, Laws, 2006, ch. 392, § 1; reenacted without change, Laws, 2008, ch. 479, § 1; reenacted without change, Laws, 2012, ch. 316, § 1, eff. 4/5/2012.
Reenacted without change by Laws, 2022, ch. 311, HB 534,§ 1, eff. 6/30/2022.
Reenacted without change by Laws, 2018, ch. 408, HB 879,§ 1, eff. 6/30/2018.
Reenacted without change by Laws, 2014, ch. 317, SB 2608, 1, eff. 3/12/2014.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
15
cases, 1998–2018 · leading case:
Tipton v. State, 41 So. 3d 679 (Miss. 2010).
Tipton v. State, 41 So. 3d 679 (Miss. 2010).
· cites it 6× “Miss.Code Ann. §§ 47-5-1001 to 47-5-1015 (Rev.”
Tipton v. State, 150 So. 3d 82 (Miss. 2014).
· cites it 2× “” Miss.Code Ann. § 47-5-1001 (Rev. 2011) (emphasis added).”
Edwards v. Booker, 796 So. 2d 991 (Miss. 2001).
“Pursuant to Miss.Code Ann. § 47-5-1001, Edwards was placed in the Intensive Supervision Program, more commonly known as "House Arrest.”
Perry v. State, 798 So. 2d 643 (Miss. Ct. App. 2001).
· cites it 3× “The court suspended the sentences and placed Perry on house arrest on the condition that he did not violate the terms of the Intensive Supervision Program ("ISP"), as described in Miss.Code Ann. §§ 47-5-1001 through XX-X-XXXX (Rev.”
Champluvier v. State, 942 So. 2d 145 (Miss. 2006).
“At a subsequent sentencing hearing, the trial judge sentenced Champluvier to concurrent sentences of five years in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections, with four and one-half years of each sentence suspended, followed by two years of house arrest pursuant to…”
Ivory v. State, 999 So. 2d 420 (Miss. Ct. App. 2009).
“" Miss.Code Ann. § 47-5-1001(e) (Rev.2004).”
Lewis v. State, 761 So. 2d 922 (Miss. Ct. App. 2000).
“" Miss.Code Ann. § 47-5-1001(e) (Supp.1999).”
Babbitt v. State, 755 So. 2d 406 (Miss. 2000).
“Miss.Code Ann. §§ 47-5-1001 through XX-X-XXXX (1993 & Supp.”
Jensen v. State, 798 So. 2d 383 (Miss. 2001).
“The trial judge sentenced Jensen to 20 years in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections (MDOC) and placed him in the Intensive Supervision Program (ISP), commonly known as house arrest, pursuant to the provisions of Miss.Code Ann. §§ 47-5-1001 to -1015 (2000).”
Moore v. State, 976 So. 2d 930 (Miss. Ct. App. 2007).
“Miss.Code Ann. §§ 47-5-1001 to 1015 (repealed effective June 30, 2004).”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 47-5-1001(e) — 3 cases
Tipton v. State, 41 So. 3d 679 (Miss. 2010).
“Miss.Code Ann. §§ 47-5-1001 to 47-5-1015 (Rev.”
Ivory v. State, 999 So. 2d 420 (Miss. Ct. App. 2009).
“" Miss.Code Ann. § 47-5-1001(e) (Rev.2004).”
Lewis v. State, 761 So. 2d 922 (Miss. Ct. App. 2000).
“" Miss.Code Ann. § 47-5-1001(e) (Supp.1999).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.