Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 47-7-71 (2026)

Uniform act for out-of-state parolee supervision

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

I. The governor of this state is hereby authorized and directed to execute a compact on behalf of the state of Mississippi with any of the United States legally joining therein in the form substantially as follows:
A Compact
Entered into by and among the contracting states, signatories hereto, with the consent of the congress of the United States of America, granted by an act entitled "An act granting the consent of Congress to any two (2) or more states to enter into agreements or compacts for cooperative effort and mutual assistance in the prevention of crime and for other purposes."
The contracting states solemnly agree:
- (1) That it shall be competent for the duly constituted judicial and administrative authorities of a state party to this compact (herein called "sending state"), to permit any person convicted of an offense within such state and placed on probation or released on parole to reside in any other state party to this compact (herein called "receiving state"), while on probation or parole, if
  - (a) Such person is in fact a resident of or has his family residing within the receiving state and can obtain employment there;
  - (b) Though not a resident of the receiving state and not having his family residing there, the receiving state consents to such person being sent there.
    Before granting such permission, opportunity shall be granted to the receiving state to investigate the home and prospective employment of such person.
    A resident of the receiving state, within the meaning of this section, is one who has been an actual inhabitant of such state continuously for more than one (1) year prior to his coming to the sending state and has not resided within the sending state more than six (6) continuous months immediately preceding the commission of the offense for which he has been convicted.
- (2) That each receiving state will assume the duties of visitation of and supervision over probationers or parolees of any sending state and in the exercise of those duties will be governed by the same standards that prevail for its own probationers and parolees.
- (3) That duly accredited officers of a sending state may at all times enter a receiving state and there apprehend and retake any person on probation or parole. For that purpose no formalities will be required other than establishing the authority of the officer and the identity of the person to be retaken. All legal requirements to obtain extradition of fugitives from justice are hereby expressly waived on the part of states party hereto, as to such persons. The decision of the sending state to retake a person on probation or parole shall be conclusive upon and not reviewable within the receiving state: Provided, however, that if at the time when a state seeks to retake a probationer or parolee there should be pending against him within the receiving state any criminal charge, or he should be suspected of having committed within such state a criminal offense, he shall not be retaken without the consent of the receiving state until discharged from prosecution or from imprisonment for such offense.
- (4) That the duly accredited officers of the sending state will be permitted to transport prisoners being retaken through any and all states parties to this compact, without interference.
- (5) That the governor of each state may designate an officer who, acting jointly with like officers of other contracting states, if and when appointed, shall promulgate such rules and regulations as may be deemed necessary to more effectively carry out the terms of this compact.
- (6) That this compact shall become operative immediately upon its execution by any state as between it and any other state or states so executing. When executed it shall have the full force and effect of law within such state, the form of execution to be in accordance with the laws of the executing state.
- (7) That this compact shall continue in force and remain binding upon each executing state until renounced by it. The duties and obligations hereunder of a renouncing state shall continue as to parolees or probationers residing therein at the time of withdrawal until retaken or finally discharged by the sending state. Renunciation of this compact shall be by the same authority which executed it, by sending six (6) months' notice in writing of its intention to withdraw from the compact to the other state party hereto.

II. This section may be cited as the uniform act for out-of-state parolee supervision.

Codes, 1942, § 4004.5; Laws, 1948, ch. 436, §§ 1, 3; brought forward, Laws, 1981, ch. 465, § 115; reenacted, Laws, 1984, ch. 471, § 125; reenacted, Laws, 1986, ch. 413, § 125, eff. 3/28/1986.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases, 1997–2009 · leading case: Doe v. State Ex Rel. Mississippi Dept. of Corr., 859 So. 2d 350 (Miss. 2003).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Doe v. State Ex Rel. Mississippi Dept. of Corr., 859 So. 2d 350 (Miss. 2003). · cites it 6× “See Miss.Code Ann. § 47-7-71 (Rev.2000). Known as the "Compact," signatories thereto basically agree that the "receiving state" will assume supervisory responsibilities over parolees and probationers released from the "sending state.”

Tunica Cnty. v. Gray, 13 So. 3d 826 (Miss. 2009). · cites it 2× “In reaching the conclusion that no private cause of action existed, this Court adopted the analysis of a Wisconsin district court: To determine whether a statute creates a private right of action in favor of a particular plaintiff, a court must analyze the statute itself and any…”

Atwell v. State, 848 So. 2d 190 (Miss. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “Miss.Code Ann. § 47-7-71 (Rev.2000); Tenn.”

Connell v. State ex rel. Mississippi Dep't of Corr., 841 So. 2d 1127 (Miss. 2003). · cites it 6× “See Miss.Code Ann. § 47-7-71 (Rev.2000). Known as the *1130 “Compact,” signatories thereto basically agree that the “receiving state” will assume supervisory responsibilities over parolees and probationers released from the “sending state.”

Hodgson v. Mississippi Dep't of Corr., 963 F. Supp. 776 (E.D. Wis. 1997). “Miss.Code Ann. § 47-7-71. In 1939, Wisconsin enacted the Uniform Act which is codified at Section 304.”

Jane Doe v. State of Mississippi (Miss. 2001). · cites it 6× “See Miss. Code Ann. § 47-7-71 (Rev. 2000). Known as the "Compact," signatories thereto basically agree that the "receiving state" will assume supervisory responsibilities over parolees and probationers released from the "sending state.”

Norman v. Prestage Farms, Inc. (In Re Moore), 310 B.R. 795 (Bankr. N.D. Miss. 2004). “This Act, which is known as the “Compact” and is found at Miss.Code Ann. § 47-7-71 (Rev. 2000), provides that the “receiving state” will assume responsibility over parolees and probationers released from the “sending state.”

— Miss. Code Ann. § 47-7-71(1) — 3 cases

Doe v. State Ex Rel. Mississippi Dept. of Corr., 859 So. 2d 350 (Miss. 2003). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 47-7-71 (Rev.2000). Known as the "Compact," signatories thereto basically agree that the "receiving state" will assume supervisory responsibilities over parolees and probationers released from the "sending state.”

Atwell v. State, 848 So. 2d 190 (Miss. Ct. App. 2003). “Miss.Code Ann. § 47-7-71 (Rev.2000); Tenn.”

Connell v. State ex rel. Mississippi Dep't of Corr., 841 So. 2d 1127 (Miss. 2003). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 47-7-71 (Rev.2000). Known as the *1130 “Compact,” signatories thereto basically agree that the “receiving state” will assume supervisory responsibilities over parolees and probationers released from the “sending state.”

— Miss. Code Ann. § 47-7-71(2) — 2 cases

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.