Miss. Code Ann. » Miss. Code Ann. / Title 49 / Chapter 17
Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-1 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 49-17-1 through 49-17-43 may be cited as the "Mississippi Air and Water Pollution Control Law."

Codes, 1942, § 7106-135; Laws, 1966, ch. 258, § 25, eff. 7/1/1966.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1980–2004 · leading case: TK Stanley, Inc. v. Cason, 614 So. 2d 942 (Miss. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
TK Stanley, Inc. v. Cason, 614 So. 2d 942 (Miss. 1993). “Stanley repeats its objection here to Instruction P-6, which was taken from part of the Mississippi Air and Water Pollution Control Law ( Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-1 to 49-17-43 (1972)) and designates certain air pollution as "unlawful.”
City of Jackson v. Filtrol Corp., 624 F.2d 1384 (5th Cir. 1980). “The City claims that Filtrol acted illegally under the Mississippi Air and Water Pollution Control Law, Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-1 et seq. This law was not enacted until 1972, however.”
Barrett Refining Corp. v. Mississippi Comm'n on Env't Quality, 751 So. 2d 1104 (Miss. Ct. App. 1999). “§§ 6901 through 6992k; Mississippi Air and Water Pollution Control Law, Miss.Code Ann. §§ 49-17-1 through 49-17-45 (Supp.”
Norman v. Prestage Farms, Inc. (In Re Moore), 306 B.R. 849 (Bankr. N.D. Miss. 2004). · cites it 2× “The Mississippi Air and Water Pollution Control Law The plaintiffs allege that the actions of the defendants constitute a public nuisance in violation of the provisions of the Mississippi Air and Water Pollution Control Law, codified in Miss.Code Ann. § 49-17-1, et seq. The…”
Norman v. Prestage Farms, Inc. (In Re Moore), 310 B.R. 795 (Bankr. N.D. Miss. 2004). “The court withheld a dispositive decision on the motions for summary judgment until the parties could brief the issue of whether an individual plaintiff enjoyed a private right of action to seek redress for violations of the Mississippi Air and Water Pollution Control Law,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.