Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 61-3-67 (2026)

Joint operations; authorization

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

For the purposes of Sections 61-3-67 through 61-3-75, unless otherwise qualified, the term "public agency" includes municipality and authority, each as defined in this chapter, any agency of the state government and of the United States, and any municipality, political subdivision and agency of an adjoining state. The term "governing body" includes the commissioners of an authority, the governing body of a municipality, and the head of an agency of a state or the United States if the public agency is other than an authority or municipality.

All powers, privileges, and authority granted by this chapter may be exercised and enjoyed by an authority jointly with any public agency of this state, and jointly with any public agency of any adjoining state or of the United States to the extent that the laws of such other state or of the United States permit such joint exercise of enjoyment. Any agency of the state government, when acting jointly with any authority, may exercise and enjoy all the powers, privileges, and authority conferred by this chapter upon an authority.

Codes, 1942, § 7545-44; Laws, 1958, ch. 230, § 14.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1999–2002 · leading case: Falco Lime, Inc. v. Mayor & Aldermen of City of Vicksburg, 836 So. 2d 711 (Miss. 2002).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Falco Lime, Inc. v. Mayor & Aldermen of City of Vicksburg, 836 So. 2d 711 (Miss. 2002). · cites it 25× “which is that Miss. Code Ann. §§ 61-3-67 through 61-3-75 presuppose that the land for the airport at issue would be located in Mississippi, not outside of our borders.”

Falco Lime, Inc. v. Mayor & Bd. of Aldermen (Miss. 1999). · cites it 25× “which is that Miss. Code Ann. §§ 61-3-67 through 61-3-75 presuppose that the land for the airport at issue would be located in Mississippi, not outside of our borders.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.