Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 63-3-103 (2026)

Vehicles

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Codes, 1942, § 8127; Laws, 1938, ch. 200; Laws, 1973, ch. 338, § 1; Laws, 1976, ch. 348; Laws, 1980, ch. 316, § 2; Laws, 1983, ch. 350, § 1; Laws, 1986, ch. 459, § 35; Laws, 2000, ch. 318, § 1; Laws, 2003, ch. 485, § 9; Laws, 2004, ch. 425, § 3; Laws, 2012, ch. 452, § 1, eff. 4/18/2012.

Amended by Laws, 2023, ch. 443, HB 1003,§ 16, eff. 7/1/2023.

Amended by Laws, 2022, ch. 439, SB 2508,§ 6, eff. 7/1/2022.

Amended by Laws, 2021, ch. 355, HB 1195,§ 6, eff. 7/1/2021.

Amended by Laws, 2018, ch. 445, HB 1343,§ 1, eff. 1/1/2019.

Amended by Laws, 2018, ch. 304, SB 2629,§ 1, eff. 7/1/2018.

Amended by Laws, 2015, ch. 464, HB 1251, 3, eff. 7/1/2015.

Amended by Laws, 2015, ch. 406, HB 111, 1, eff. 7/1/2015.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2009–2014 · leading case: Green v. Life Ins. Co. of North Am., 754 F.3d 324 (5th Cir. 2014).
Green v. Life Ins. Co. of North Am., 754 F.3d 324 (5th Cir. 2014). · cites it 3× “” See Miss. Code Ann. § 63-3-103 (b). Finally, Plaintiffs argue that federal law recognizes that a “vessel” is not a “vehicle,” and therefore, LINA’s conclusion that the exclusion applies is erroneous.”
A.B. Ex Rel. C.D. v. Stone Cnty. Sch. Dist., 14 So. 3d 794 (Miss. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “2007) (misdemeanor to misrepresent the average number of children in attendance); Miss. Code Ann. § 63-3-103 (e) (Rev.2004) (defining school bus and requiring plain markings).”
In Re Clemons, 441 B.R. 519 (Bankr. N.D. Miss. 2010). “Miss.Code Ann. § 63-3-103 (Motor Vehicles and Traffic Regulation-Definitions) sets forth the following pertinent definitions: (a) “Vehicle” means every device upon or by which any person or property is or may be transported or drawn upon a highway, except devices used…”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 63-3-103(a) — 1 case
Green v. Life Ins. Co. of North Am., 754 F.3d 324 (5th Cir. 2014). “” See Miss. Code Ann. § 63-3-103 (b). Finally, Plaintiffs argue that federal law recognizes that a “vessel” is not a “vehicle,” and therefore, LINA’s conclusion that the exclusion applies is erroneous.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.