Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 63-3-519 (2026)

Use of radar speed detection equipment; authorization and limitations; notification of road blockages or emergencies on certain federally designated limited-access highways

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

It shall be unlawful for any person or peace officer or law enforcement agency, except the Mississippi Highway Safety Patrol, to purchase or use or allow to be used any type of radar speed detection equipment upon any public street, road or highway of this state. However, such equipment may be used:

(a) By municipal law enforcement officers within a municipality having a population of two thousand (2,000) or more according to the latest or a previous federal census upon the public streets of the municipality, but in no case where the latest federal census population for the municipality is less than one thousand five hundred (1,500);

(b) By any college or university campus police force within the confines of any campus wherein more than two thousand (2,000) students are enrolled;

(c) By municipal law enforcement officers in any municipality having a population in excess of fifteen thousand (15,000) according to the latest federal census on federally designated highways lying within the corporate limits.

(d) By municipal law enforcement officers upon the public streets of any incorporated municipality (i) where the county seat is located in the municipality and (ii) where there is a public community college located in the municipality.

The Mississippi Highway Safety Patrol shall be immediately notified by municipal law enforcement of any road blockages or emergencies occurring on any federally designated limited-access highways lying within the corporate limits.

Codes, 1942, § 8176.5; Laws, 1966, ch. 383, §§ 1, 2; Laws, 1968, ch. 542, § 1, eff. 5/15/1968.

Amended by Laws, 2023, ch. 398, HB 454,§ 1, eff. 3/22/2023.

Amended by Laws, 2022, ch. 307, HB 567,§ 1, eff. 7/1/2022.

Amended by Laws, 2021, ch. 373, SB 2788,§ 1, eff. 7/1/2021.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1998–2009 · leading case: Delker v. State, 50 So. 3d 309 (Miss. Ct. App. 2009).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Delker v. State, 50 So. 3d 309 (Miss. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “Miss.Code Ann. § 63-3-519(1) (Rev.2004). [9] It is possible that the circuit court did not resolve the issue based on a good-faith analysis because to do so would carry the possibility that, had the circuit court declined to believe that Chief Langston acted in good faith, it…”

Moore v. City of Louisville, 716 So. 2d 1136 (Miss. Ct. App. 1998). “Miss.Code Ann. § 63-3-519 (Rev.1996). ¶ 5.”

— Miss. Code Ann. § 63-3-519(1) — 1 case

Delker v. State, 50 So. 3d 309 (Miss. Ct. App. 2009). “Miss.Code Ann. § 63-3-519(1) (Rev.2004). [9] It is possible that the circuit court did not resolve the issue based on a good-faith analysis because to do so would carry the possibility that, had the circuit court declined to believe that Chief Langston acted in good faith, it…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.