Miss. Code Ann. » Miss. Code Ann. / Title 75 / Chapter 24
Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 75-24-11 (2026)

Additional orders or judgments; appointment of receiver; revocation of license or certificate to do business

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The court may make such additional orders or judgments, including restitution, as may be necessary to restore to any person in interest any monies or property, real or personal, which may have been acquired by means of any practice prohibited by this chapter, including the appointment of a receiver or the revocation of a license or certificate authorizing that person to engage in business in this state, or both.

Laws, 1974, ch. 555, § 6; Laws, 1994, ch. 537, § 4, eff. 3/29/1994.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2012–2024 · leading case: Watson Labs., Inc. v. State of Mississippi, 241 So. 3d 573 (Miss. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Watson Labs., Inc. v. State of Mississippi, 241 So. 3d 573 (Miss. 2018). · cites it 2× “” Miss. Code Ann. § 75-24-11 (Rev. 2016). The State claims that the chancery court should have awarded it $7,141,552, the same amount it received as compensatory damages for the fraud claim.”
State of Mississippi v. AU Optronics Corp., 701 F.3d 796 (5th Cir. 2012). · cites it 2× “12-60704 to seek restitution for its own injury, see Miss. Code Ann. § 75-24-11 . However, no provision of the MCPA gives the State authority to enforce claims for injuries suffered by others.”
In re Stand. & Poor's Rating Agency Litig., 23 F. Supp. 3d 378 (S.D.N.Y. 2014). “In arguing that Mississippi is not a real party in interest, S & P and Moody’s rely principally on the fact that the Complaint seeks disgorgement and other forms of “equitable relief’ under Miss.Code Ann. § 75-24-11, pursuant to. which a court “may” order restitution.”
Connecticut v. Sandoz, Inc. (D. Conn. 2024). “, Miss. Code Ann. § 75-24-11 (authorizing courts to “make such additional orders or judgments, including restitution, as may be necessary to restore to any person in interest any monies or property, real or personal, which may have been acquired by means of any practice…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.