Mississippi Code

Miss. Code Ann. § 75-3-118 (2026)

Statute of limitations

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaMiss. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Former § 75-3-118: Codes, 1942, § 41A:3-118; Laws, 1966, ch. 316, § 3-118; Laws, 1992, ch. 420, § 18, eff. 1/1/1993.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1978–2026 · leading case: Peoples Bank of Biloxi, Mississippi v. John McAdams, 171 So. 3d 505 (Miss. 2015).
Peoples Bank of Biloxi, Mississippi v. John McAdams, 171 So. 3d 505 (Miss. 2015). “Whether the Chancery Clerk’s claims for conversion of a negotiable instrument are time-barred by the three-year statute of limitations contained in Miss. Code Ann. § 75-3-118 IV. Whether the Chancery Clerk’s negligence and gross negligence claims are time-barred by the…”
Thomas L. Roberts v. S. Wood Piedmont Co. & Bryan Inspection Agency, Inc. v. W. E. Roberts, Counter, 571 F.2d 276 (5th Cir. 1978). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 75-3-118(d) (1972). Therefore, in light of the failure of the parties to agree upon a specific rate of interest, the court did not err in charging Roberts with interest at six percent.”
Hubbard v. Bancorpsouth Bank, 135 So. 3d 882 (Miss. 2014). “Section 75-3-118 states in pertinent part: (a) [A]n action to enforce the obligation of a party to pay a note payable at a definite time must be commenced within six (6) years after the due date or dates stated in the note or, if a due date is accelerated, within six (6) years…”
Erin Burns & Shaun Burns, Co-Executors of The Est. of Katheryn Suzanne Burns, & Erin Burns, Individually v. BancorpSouth Bank & Trustmark Corp. (Miss. Ct. App. 2023). “Article 3 of the UCC, governing negotiable instruments, provides in part: Unless governed by other law regarding claims for indemnity or contribution, an action (i) for conversion of an instrument, for money had and received, or like action based on conversion, (ii) for breach…”
James Rhea v. Career Gen. Agency, Inc., GuideOne Am. Ins. Co. & Dennis Basden (Miss. Ct. App. 2022). “§ 15-1-49 , we find no plain error in the court’s failure to discern the applicability of the Uniform Commercial Code’s statute of limitations for negotiable instruments, see Miss. Code Ann. § 75-3-118 . CONCLUSION ¶17.”
OneWest Bank, FSB v. Patricia Lynn Brown-Wood (Miss. Ct. App. 2026). “Miss. Code Ann. § 75-3-118 (a) (Rev. 2016).”
Albert John Chimento, Sr. v. Robert Albert Fuller (Miss. 2006). “11 installment notes ( Miss. Code Ann. § 75-3-118 ) is applicable.”
Brent Hubbard v. BancorpSouth Bank (Miss. 2013). “Section 75-3-118 states in pertinent part: (a) [A]n action to enforce the obligation of a party to pay a note payable at a definite time must be commenced within six (6) years after the due date or dates stated in the note or, if a due date is accelerated, within six (6) years…”
— Miss. Code Ann. § 75-3-118(d) — 1 case
Thomas L. Roberts v. S. Wood Piedmont Co. & Bryan Inspection Agency, Inc. v. W. E. Roberts, Counter, 571 F.2d 276 (5th Cir. 1978). “See Miss.Code Ann. § 75-3-118(d) (1972). Therefore, in light of the failure of the parties to agree upon a specific rate of interest, the court did not err in charging Roberts with interest at six percent.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.